On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:45 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:40 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Gr. Why isn't the archive including In-Reply-To: in the mailto: link? > > Hm. Is it still including the In-Reply-To: of the message instead of the > Message-Id:? Poxy fucking mailman. -- dwmw2