[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:56 2020
Received: from st43p00im-ztdg10073201.me.com ([17.58.63.177])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1jeshC-0007kT-Ei
 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:02:07 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai;
 t=1590811320; bh=0VKHNmbwReZJMkvs9zHMZbj6TtK+9BAnz7NLIJtSCLw=;
 h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To;
 b=MbFH8q+qqYnn2fbwkRjtjEGcs8YbvJQAjGKRMz5MrQId4jABxjwRqCv0VXHX7uRoL
 gxSk6JaGAWcv08np01Rqau3J0/Stz+RW3Y3+oZ7Ong76oBn2nEjb/gHFiBbQ0GXqgf
 S9DPBX4zvz8dAWxgoKKfj9Gy8m2Qp9nWJ7yLQZVhnm8H8+rGHouUOguH6XOvEcylgs
 JBmDi29ciX10zhqJxR5ma4VXdmdJHgCLlkr9S7wwRzd1RkgPSnOvEP8mYn1gI0aDgr
 mSeA+SB3IrtcN2OyKtjR1VEEJUAHjnZEjuNl2oIWax6bpl15+IIMLGW1zmKgrk+DNY
 d7DxYDp5q1CRA==
Received: from imac-27-2019.lan (c-71-204-6-23.hsd1.ga.comcast.net
 [71.204.6.23])
 by st43p00im-ztdg10073201.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03C2F221F60;
 Sat, 30 May 2020 04:01:59 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] treewide: rename DEVICE_TYPE to
 DEFAULT_TYPE
From: Raylynn Knight <rayknight@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <8605e0b0-7f4b-438b-a337-b6253c094f07@universe-factory.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 00:01:58 -0400
Cc: Adrian Schmutzler <mail@adrianschmutzler.de>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org,
 Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <42114280-E5D1-4C7D-9AFF-09EA81CCAEB8@me.com>
References: <20200529172238.43399-1-freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
 <20200529172238.43399-4-freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
 <b580be00-df26-3938-c8f1-7a0bbc3f1419@universe-factory.net>
 <01d201d635fb$190b6950$4b223bf0$@adrianschmutzler.de>
 <8605e0b0-7f4b-438b-a337-b6253c094f07@universe-factory.net>
To: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687
 definitions=2020-05-30_01:2020-05-28,
 2020-05-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0
 malwarescore=0
 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0
 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2005300029
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200529_210206_561305_3284168C 
X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE (   8.87  )
X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message.
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary:
 Content analysis details:   (-0.9 points)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [17.58.63.177 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider [rayknight[at]me.com]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 envelope-from domain
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
 valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 author's domain
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [17.58.63.177 listed in wl.mailspike.net]



> On May 29, 2020, at 5:12 PM, Matthias Schiffer =
<mschiffer@universe-factory.net> wrote:
>=20
> Meanwhile I've found another target-specific config setting in the =
busybox
> package: BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_TRUNCATE is enabled for TARGET_bcm53xx only.
>=20
> I assume "truncate" is tiny enough that it doesn't really justify =
making
> busybox non-shared, we could just build in truncate unconditionally. I
> don't know how contrained some of the "nas" targets are, but maybe we
> should just replace the busybox hack with a full-featured hdparm on =
these
> targets?
>=20
> Matthias

Two of NAS type targets that want hdparm are the kirkwood devices and =
oxnas devices.  Most of the kirkwood and oxnas devices have at least =
128MB NAND flash, those that don=E2=80=99t usually use the disk drive =
for storage.

Ray



]