[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:42 2020 Received: from st43p00im-ztfb10061701.me.com ([17.58.63.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j7BXC-0000MI-UJ for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:33 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1582780586; bh=Ickw3XoxYvbzo7lVcvaIUvxw8zCyLyc6v3UfEpKXue8=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=Z4z+jbbSwk+v5SOmRJ4hUuomqwfT5GE4X4dlf9r1QQ/Yft1AQZDukIzRFjln94sgV gKHAaZDIOglERqGkvC1gZywDM1tYbeSL7cU9WkqtT3tC2wsCLV6c/ahGOWaEb9rRVI 8C22QLpOGaqvQTooVT3mtsVoNq3pH6lEsPL7jcTmb+esGciQ9wIEQbj3E6A98TMDEI TZgCGa5Xpu4tNr24GFvdNigTRS3GlD63Og4lTgNl4wIts6YR/hEZwC38kP325PCJN9 xRZe+zMrAfrL6r1QUHN1lDh6aAMsn7ZXIoI2OJpaB8yb50L0X1hDCh3MvhDubqWgir l28bA/XWT/KpQ== Received: from imac-27-2017.lan (c-71-204-6-23.hsd1.ga.comcast.net [71.204.6.23]) by st43p00im-ztfb10061701.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E65DAC0539; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kirkwood: convert DTS patches into plain DTS files From: Raylynn Knight <rayknight@me.com> In-Reply-To: <005c01d5ebca$18761290$496237b0$@adrianschmutzler.de> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:16:25 -0500 Cc: openWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <37009CB8-2488-459D-8EB3-B31281FD2AD8@me.com> References: <20200224120605.152672-1-mans0n@gorani.run> <020001d5eb15$97c9e810$c75db830$@adrianschmutzler.de> <BF9B5E3E-E8A4-4798-B85A-1078A871F6A2@me.com> <005c01d5ebca$18761290$496237b0$@adrianschmutzler.de> To: Adrian Schmutzler <mail@adrianschmutzler.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-26_09:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-2002270039 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200226_211631_055788_18695404 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.08 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider [rayknight[at]me.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [17.58.63.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Sorry, I did intend the email for the list. I actually have an example of all of the devices affected by this patch = except the nsa310b. Would there be any issue with me trying to get the = OpenWrt patches upstreamed? Ray =20 > On Feb 25, 2020, at 5:55 AM, Adrian Schmutzler = <mail@adrianschmutzler.de> wrote: >=20 > Hi Ray, >=20 > was this a private message by intention? >=20 > This patch only reorganizes the existing files in OpenWrt's kirkwood. = While I've > been involved in cleaning up the kirkwood target recently, this not = even my > patch. >=20 > I personally don't think that upstreaming DTS files for devices I've = never even > touched is a good idea. For that, I think the best way would be to = contact the > original authors of device support or at least find somebody who = really has the > device. >=20 > So, while I would welcome to upstream the code in general, I do not = see that > this would be Sungbo Eo's or my job right now. >=20 > In contrast, it might be a good idea to mention this in the currently = pending > device support PRs for Kirkwood if you think it would be worth it. >=20 > Best >=20 > Adrian >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Raylynn Knight [mailto:rayknight@me.com] >> Sent: Dienstag, 25. Februar 2020 04:39 >> To: Adrian Schmutzler <mail@adrianschmutzler.de> >> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kirkwood: convert DTS patches = into plain >> DTS files >>=20 >> What is the reason that these DTS files are not submitted upstream to = the >> kernel? >>=20 >> Ray >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Feb 24, 2020, at 8:23 AM, Adrian Schmutzler = <mail@adrianschmutzler.de> >> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: openwrt-devel = [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces@lists.openwrt.org] On >>>> Behalf Of Sungbo Eo >>>> Sent: Montag, 24. Februar 2020 13:06 >>>> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>> Cc: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run> >>>> Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kirkwood: convert DTS patches into = plain >> DTS >>>> files >>>>=20 >>>> Move DTS files newly created by patch files to files directory. = This will > make >>>> these files much more maintainable. >>>>=20 >>>> Patching the kernel Makefile is unnecessary, as the DTS files = specified in >>>> DEVICE_DTS will be compiled by OpenWrt buildroot anyway. >>>=20 >>> I personally see it the same way, though I'm aware this in handled > differently >>> for different targets. >>> This change will just remove one layer of complexity. >>>=20 >>> Acked-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de> >>>=20 >>> Best >>>=20 >>> Adrian >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >=20 >=20 ]