[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:42 2020
Received: from st43p00im-ztfb10061701.me.com ([17.58.63.172])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1j7XZn-00068s-2O
 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:48:41 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai;
 t=1582865316; bh=N+WmlzIDaXR++ruyYu9kyjNa1Hf73dwlPR/PgR9JoOg=;
 h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To;
 b=yGKpMplFVFeIyAynDIqe8SeY5KjvhaC9ZW8HjgiKOOIklGI5LYjx6/DhhvBn6cAFb
 98Le1ZfBh9vMktxrjbWP2mUOzx2y35nCkmkr5CjjRC0rD8K3/B+IAowA7ZPOVvQUJ9
 CpIpJr4HLQ4W66R85aFuC+4CNYn+v6J4CbWvbRn5heFbxhDa1uXDO/u7lrq4wmQefK
 HfaGcJuwkucxG0oB9ex3TH3mDfTmW+5WM4lQMGSuoeoDhu6oBGqxZ6lz8YZPynVyTa
 iu0YyjvOiVgBaTYQM1/capdbMcRa47t+LZSyvOuRbQ4tAzC1w7T/sMMv+0+QunLj9y
 JFGodxUHBu5fA==
Received: from imac-27-2017.lan (c-71-204-6-23.hsd1.ga.comcast.net
 [71.204.6.23])
 by st43p00im-ztfb10061701.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15A64AC0678;
 Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:48:36 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kirkwood: convert DTS patches into plain
 DTS files
From: Raylynn Knight &lt;rayknight@me.com&gt;
In-Reply-To: &lt;58dc20a2-a8ba-62e5-a13e-ad2833674289@gmail.com&gt;
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:48:35 -0500
Cc: openWrt Development List &lt;openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org&gt;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: &lt;BF472858-FB3C-4B5D-A869-847DABCE33B9@me.com&gt;
References: &lt;20200224120605.152672-1-mans0n@gorani.run&gt;
 &lt;020001d5eb15$97c9e810$c75db830$@adrianschmutzler.de&gt;
 &lt;BF9B5E3E-E8A4-4798-B85A-1078A871F6A2@me.com&gt;
 &lt;005c01d5ebca$18761290$496237b0$@adrianschmutzler.de&gt;
 &lt;mailman.34108.1582780593.2486.openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org&gt;
 &lt;58dc20a2-a8ba-62e5-a13e-ad2833674289@gmail.com&gt;
To: Alberto Bursi &lt;bobafetthotmail@gmail.com&gt;
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
 definitions=2020-02-27_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0
 malwarescore=0
 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0
 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-2002280042
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200227_204839_186047_2DAD9A1C 
X-CRM114-Status: GOOD (  13.89  )
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary:
 Content analysis details:   (-0.9 points)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [17.58.63.172 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider [rayknight[at]me.com]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 author's domain
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
 valid

Don=E2=80=99t know how successful I=E2=80=99ll be at upstreaming as the =
last time I had code accepted into the kernel was back in 2002/2003 when =
I was active in the m68k Mac port.   It will probably be late March =
before I will have time I can commit to the effort, but I have a large =
collection of Kirkwood based devices that I would like to see upstreamed =
and supported by OpenWrt.  I just need to find the time to work on them!

Ray


&gt; On Feb 27, 2020, at 3:44 AM, Alberto Bursi &lt;bobafetthotmail@gmail.com&gt; =
wrote:
&gt;=20
&gt;=20
&gt;=20
&gt; On 27/02/20 06:16, Raylynn Knight via openwrt-devel wrote:
&gt;&gt; The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which =
disallows
&gt;&gt; sending mailing list messages using the original &quot;From&quot; header.
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt; To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
&gt;&gt; automatically by the mailing list software.
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt; Sorry, I did intend the email for the list.
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt; I actually have an example of all of the devices affected by this =
patch except the nsa310b.  Would there be any issue with me trying to =
get the OpenWrt patches upstreamed?
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt; Ray
&gt;&gt; =20
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt;&gt; openwrt-devel mailing list
&gt;&gt;=20
&gt;&gt; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
&gt;&gt; https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
&gt;=20
&gt;=20
&gt; I have a nsa310b and I can test things on it, if you want to upstream =
its patches.
&gt;=20
&gt; If you are good at upstreaming, could you also consider upstreaming =
the ledtrig-libata patch?
&gt;=20
&gt; =
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/generic/pendin=
g-4.19/834-ledtrig-libata.patch
&gt;=20
&gt; It's about creating a led trigger for each SATA port and it would be =
nice to have upstream too.
&gt;=20
&gt; -Alberto
&gt;=20


]