[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:36 2020
Received: from mr85p00im-hyfv06021401.me.com ([17.58.23.190])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1imueZ-0004hq-Uf
 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 07:12:21 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai;
 t=1577949138; bh=mnc8euRyuDxid8yuYvCJjNjOt7S9zn+xIXkrnvFpgpo=;
 h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To;
 b=ASA0ManIygOdaBQQPSPOIfFGAcuxyVzAEga0beFNs8znZBpNpj9JWww9ffuwe0nVm
 BiMjKxoD4spLqoQLLYnzlIL2Q4WR4TP8U3spc9SAGxBeQ6c99cbOsJT+cvEz7O7jyL
 g3UGLJ5dZcjO+up5hDGjzijVHnBeLkTbwHCRBqq6G4/ugzA6c2ANBeg1OHioUvcNo/
 x+GM6E54A0rXmqRgFXqhb7Lmzan5KV93BXd80Z8aMUAhJXdQ/45qihnlDkWNqE1E0K
 t4BTIm7Hzjs5IQ/0M+VMfwp+R35rRIfrlXfw2Y9snKTNmpF+yQiRz8qWY6WWRfWTD0
 quyfd74Is+fDw==
Received: from mbp-2.lan (78-80-17-93.nat.epc.tmcz.cz [78.80.17.93])
 by mr85p00im-hyfv06021401.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83C159C06D2;
 Thu,  2 Jan 2020 07:12:17 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Sysupgrade possibly broken in recent development
 snapshots: &quot;message&quot;: &quot;Firmware image couldn't be validated&quot;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Petr_Nov=C3=A1k?= &lt;petrn@me.com&gt;
In-Reply-To: &lt;20200102071038.GT70184@meh.true.cz&gt;
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 08:12:14 +0100
Cc: Hannu Nyman &lt;hannu.nyman@welho.com&gt;,
 openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: &lt;1C9CB51F-5288-4577-9C5F-72F5EF65E3EA@me.com&gt;
References: &lt;20191231134925.GL70184@meh.true.cz&gt;
 &lt;C9B93DB4-A2CA-455B-8B4F-E7A23E34D141@me.com&gt;
 &lt;20200101124453.GM70184@meh.true.cz&gt;
 &lt;2DF80201-77E5-4301-9046-67165E5A8B9C@me.com&gt;
 &lt;20200101161447.GQ70184@meh.true.cz&gt;
 &lt;DC52BD3D-AB2B-426F-A184-C1F7664BB076@me.com&gt;
 &lt;20200101200825.GR70184@meh.true.cz&gt;
 &lt;C6E8AA31-AE61-40F5-881B-A69A2007272B@me.com&gt;
 &lt;20200101204630.GS70184@meh.true.cz&gt;
 &lt;93DDE8E1-7766-41E2-B469-F147637128A6@me.com&gt;
 &lt;20200102071038.GT70184@meh.true.cz&gt;
To: =?utf-8?Q?Petr_=C5=A0tetiar?= &lt;ynezz@true.cz&gt;
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
 definitions=2020-01-02_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0
 malwarescore=0
 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0
 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-2001020066
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200101_231219_996130_B8003B69 
X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE (   6.82  )
X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message.
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary:
 Content analysis details:   (-0.9 points)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [17.58.23.190 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (petrn[at]me.com)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
 valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature

OK, fair enough. In any case thanks for helping to fix this, I hope this =
will be pulled soon into the main repo.

Petr


&gt; On 2 Jan 2020, at 08:10, Petr =C5=A0tetiar &lt;ynezz@true.cz&gt; wrote:
&gt;=20
&gt; Petr Nov=C3=A1k &lt;petrn@me.com&gt; [2020-01-02 08:01:54]:
&gt;=20
&gt;&gt; or perhaps we can ship you a RPi4 and you can return it once you are =
done with it?
&gt;=20
&gt; Thanks for the offer, but I've already spent more time on this than =
planed and
&gt; it's not me who want to know the answer :-)
&gt;=20
&gt; -- ynezz


]