[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:36 2020
Received: from mr85p00im-ztdg06021801.me.com ([17.58.23.195])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1in5D7-0008V9-A9
 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 18:28:42 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai;
 t=1577989720; bh=HfP0rwgczFpKtoQMjN0ZJWE/nAfNBmIoceqcBuyy41U=;
 h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Date:Message-Id:To;
 b=CaeYxSnFTpw7m32LspejolGoTmFgI/kIqOt6OgjT7zWIUc12KgS0JgcaNduVXrweH
 fKjrYAMtds+6MZ6hUfBXuIFb725nRecPzDmkAOYnQs1NfSYPs34TfYdf0OmmlydMOx
 qOIjSL79ig7ug7pCULj9lCAqDrSGkdLpx/77NTqmKzWiso+zPaFTjIEi64TjP3gkF4
 dS6oDoED/+ySAZlmuHDeh4Ty3LZJw+eBMVPjl3k3tpQKu0IOQcqI62nBOnfE34ywel
 bS0xMmKH44a/4nQ8IZuXG9rpJZNw2W6ZkhpvgU39HVPPwSilcg8Zjdc33hI5QRZNq5
 2NV0a7oeuiVCA==
Received: from [192.168.255.118] (78-80-17-93.nat.epc.tmcz.cz [78.80.17.93])
 by mr85p00im-ztdg06021801.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 009E7180B72;
 Thu,  2 Jan 2020 18:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: =?utf-8?Q?Petr_Nov=C3=A1k?= <petrn@me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Sysupgrade possibly broken in recent development
 snapshots: "message": "Firmware image couldn't be validated"
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:28:37 +0100
Message-Id: <DA62CCF1-D0A4-4B1D-8E47-66532F928CF4@me.com>
References: <20200102182643.GU70184@meh.true.cz>
Cc: Stijn Segers <foss@volatilesystems.org>,
 openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20200102182643.GU70184@meh.true.cz>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Petr_=C5=A0tetiar?= <ynezz@true.cz>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
 definitions=2020-01-02_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0
 malwarescore=0
 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0
 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-2001020153
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200102_102841_361282_2407B2D4 
X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE (   7.11  )
X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message.
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary:
 Content analysis details:   (-0.9 points)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [17.58.23.195 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (petrn[at]me.com)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 author's domain
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
 valid

Ok. Thanks for the answers.  I was hoping there may be a pattern but this do=
es not seem to be relevant.=20

> On 2 Jan 2020, at 19:27, Petr =C5=A0tetiar <ynezz@true.cz> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFPetr Nov=C3=A1k <petrn@me.com> [2020-01-02 18:40:18]:
>=20
>> Was the Qemu test Petr S. has done been running a multi-core or single co=
re emulation?
>=20
> I use 4 cores, 512M RAM as default for the QEMU machines.  I'm also testin=
g on
> ipq4018, mt7621 and i.MX6 which are multicore.
>=20
> -- ynezz


]