[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:27 2020
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1iNayo-0001kf-QU
 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:08:36 +0000
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id c17so34217572qtn.8
 for <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=Jee3t2ntDzg5HxOgQTEaVk6RBUf0KpQdBj39yRvcFxs=;
 b=IqXeOsM9t6tdP7Tv9VDLVM4a2Ed0EUDuFWYMaI4eKTH77p273L4QRNa/Jx/DO7q/8n
 JD5fpkQhoMCs0IDsfY/D0NHGdj7d3XYsmCsqAvytOLKZh6WXZw9H8hRRLql93tGyVoLv
 LnL/6UJKYmnih+S5tDoqq/w0JzFL2cauvpEmt/gpHnzMjSfhLKqfzVhEZnyo7wMqFGpn
 i8mvXhB5a0HNAPJaNvpLb9Pm3PRTRr1tmrrLNpl0p/uimQyp4rQvbWLLq1ka/jt4k+GN
 2+xOlUYaD5PB9eajQXR4zEsL/VylCAKDOIZCZ4esaEOtfdg/M1vz3dZ5vpar7NXCYi6C
 9pxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Jee3t2ntDzg5HxOgQTEaVk6RBUf0KpQdBj39yRvcFxs=;
 b=Pv6EtiJuySabnMvD5POT2xpY/se4zXPIhU0R1XjSF1I3POt0dOomC8jZ6ogNe+9aA0
 oCydYj7JLIbS5vikw4UJzLAFUcfAsER7xrLqqlKsV2hmZw7jotIMAM8aQHT75seS3pY5
 aOLl2vVNCgbxKChOL9lQOTiHIHNHyFdf0WLrm6rRlIPs37NZm2XZ2ZVH4Zmy2fJUVMdo
 bWNuICsEj8TZy1SVtRXOwQkZnegxh7IjBE+RcNfYr8g3SQEwPdhRZQS7cDTCts0KWl7E
 bAFa3XoTXHX4Lk/FHhLqv1WRk8WpjtGdiGsHbD45gSi9nUnu1tRWqk4NPXGKFpKJIBhu
 UQoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXaXIttVxdhFsrefrg4fTyTw9RqDJDee930sFZ8vb4u4xW14lnm
 qAzuWn4wlLuRS/rMyxPeEZOZervrW6mSUqM2UhA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzIztMEYfsYpR6Z7b1YIyVZlwi/DBjcpisq+ffs3mzcWR00S1mtgJRh4rQ/Pm2UVdxUQvzqtUBfQlvZny5YWUo=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:862:: with SMTP id x31mr525501qth.58.1571915313141;
 Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ec3161a0-7926-b514-6409-548d4947c9f1@rapiduswireless.com>
In-Reply-To: <ec3161a0-7926-b514-6409-548d4947c9f1@rapiduswireless.com>
From: Florian Eckert <eckert.florian@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:08:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CALPCC5yEVa66U-Xc02UOVnxcpyEHP46Jw9X+RGjDS+Py7=2hsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to add items to Luci wireless_modefreq
 template
To: Rapidus Wireless Research and Development <rand@rapiduswireless.com>
Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191024_040834_883356_CD8B9632 
X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE (   8.23  )
X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message.
X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary:
 Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:82d listed in]
 [list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (eckert.florian[at]googlemail.com)
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
 valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 envelope-from domain

Please open a bug report/issue on https://github.com/openwrt/luci/issues
Also add add version information.

> The expected behavior for items on the Luci wireless_modefreq template is that changing the value then clicking Save&Apply results in:
>
> the UCI configuration item being set and committed,
> the wireless is restarted.
> I added 2 more items to this template, but for one of them, I get 1) but not 2).
> The existing items and other added item get expected behavior.
> I guessed that you have to add the item(s) to the taboption's cfgvalue, formvalue and write functions, but is there more to it?

]