<html><head></head><body><div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">Hi Ben,<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">When do you think you can port those changes to your firmware?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">Thank you for your support.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">Klevis.</div>
<br><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:01 PM +0200, "Ben Greear" <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:greearb@candelatech.com" target="_blank">greearb@candelatech.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="3D"ltr"">
<pre>On 9/20/19 12:55 PM, Vincent Wiemann wrote:
> Hi Klevis,
>
> have you tried it with a short distance?
> If you did you should better ask Ben Greear directly.
I asked him to post publicly so that others can help answer and that my own answers might
help someone else.
I have some patches that should enable coverage class settings for wave-2, but I am too busy
with other things right now to port them to my ath10k-ct driver/firmware.
Thanks,
Ben
>
> By the way ath10k gen 2 chipsets don't work very well with long distance links without a
> special feature which implementation is only available to companies like Ubiquiti and very few
> people who have an own reverse-engineered implementation.
> It works on IPQ401X, QCA9886 and QCA9888 based chips only.
>
> And it is not possible to set a coverage class for gen 2 devices, yet as far as I know due to missing
> documentation and implementation (correct me if that information is outdated).
> Furthermore a high channel width often results in problems
> due to lower receiver sensibility.
> We have better experiences with lower channel widths and sometimes get more throughput with that.
>
> Actually I think this does not explain your connection issues as 13 km is not that much.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vincent Wiemann
>
> On 20.09.19 18:30, support@maxnet.al wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am trying to setup a custom made outdoor link with Apu2d2 board devices and QCA9994 cards from compex. After i installed openwrt and ath10k ct driver, kmod ath10k and board-2.bin the device can run a 80MHz channel in WDS AP. The problem is that it won't run as station or station wds. It can scan
>> the SSIDs but won't connect them.
>>
>> Any suggestion?
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Klevis
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
</greearb@candelatech.com></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body></html>