[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:19 2020 Received: from grosjo.net ([94.130.37.163]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hwbPS-00016x-79 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 00:08:31 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=grosjo.net; s=dkim; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RJirig7jsOJXo352SjNYcIckudzxGA5aDsalu/7Pr8k=; b=bo9/7lQUrTTLwXCHJF1lrAJLGx KpoXKYObpNJHAJMmCq3wVXj18jPxy2GP2ME6PkVwVlWKQo8XVyuaG3hWjcR+kEWjKUPflAQFiVKuH lQMO4gr4InCK92Su6ly/XxfRUQnjE1GVPHR4itpTuc0vRe7jhR9dmtuK3YSvgw7ak4LY=; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=grosjo.net) by grosjo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.92.1) (envelope-from <jom@grosjo.net>) id 1hwbPL-0000fi-Bw; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 00:08:24 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_c8986d6f2b8bd786ed73dde266b422b6" Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 08:08:23 +0800 From: Joan Moreau <jom@grosjo.net> To: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@gmail.com> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Has OpenWrt suport for Powerline devices In-Reply-To: <4fc1072b-22ae-3cd6-d592-dd8c757a6dd9@gmail.com> References: <mailman.16115.1565442835.19300.openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> <alpine.LNX.2.21.99999.352.1908101628250.23494@localhost.localdomain> <4fc1072b-22ae-3cd6-d592-dd8c757a6dd9@gmail.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4-git Message-ID: <621c052c16c1875113be1fae2f7c32a3@grosjo.net> X-Sender: jom@grosjo.net X-GJ: Sent from localhost X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "gjserver", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see admin@grosjo.net for details. Content preview: The Powerline system needs a "Lan name" in order to synchronize teh devices. How this is translated in OpenWrt ? On 2019-08-11 03:47, Lech Perczak wrote: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-GJ-SMTP: h_FROM = Joan Moreau <jom@grosjo.net> RPATH=jom@grosjo.net SENDERADR= jom@grosjo.net: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190810_170830_263206_9D6A22A4 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 1.30 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [94.130.37.163 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain --=_c8986d6f2b8bd786ed73dde266b422b6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed The Powerline system needs a "Lan name" in order to synchronize teh devices. How this is translated in OpenWrt ? On 2019-08-11 03:47, Lech Perczak wrote: > W dniu 2019-08-10 o 16:30, Enrico Mioso pisze: > >> Hello! >> I guess this is in a case-by-case basis - I have a TP-Link RE450 which is supported. >> I know there are also Wi-Fi-only devices, but don't think OpenWRt supports any of them. >> >> I guess this happens also due to the amount of flash and RAM memory those devices have. >> >> And - if you're going for the RE450, keep in mind it's u-boot doesn't seem to have any recovery method, so soldering an UART right away maybe a good option. >> >> Enrico >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > RE450 is Wifi-only. > There is actually one supported: > > https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/tp-link/tp-link_tl-wpa8630 > > -- > Pozdrawiam, > Lech Perczak > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel --=_c8986d6f2b8bd786ed73dde266b422b6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset= =3DUTF-8" /></head><body style=3D'font-size: 9pt; font-family: Verdana,Gene= va,sans-serif'> <p>The Powerline system needs a "Lan name" in order to synchronize teh devi= ces. </p> <p>How this is translated in OpenWrt ?</p> <p><br /></p> <div id=3D"signature"> </div> <p><br /></p> <p id=3D"reply-intro">On 2019-08-11 03:47, Lech Perczak wrote:</p> <blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2= px solid; margin: 0"> <div id=3D"replybody1"> <div> <div class=3D"v1moz-cite-prefix">W dniu 2019-08-10 o 16:30, Enrico Mio= so pisze:</div> <blockquote id=3D"v1mid_alpine_LNX_2_21_99999_352_1908101628250_23494_local= host_localdomain" class=3D"v1cite">Hello! <br />I guess this is in a case-b= y-case basis - I have a TP-Link RE450 which is supported. <br />I know ther= e are also Wi-Fi-only devices, but don't think OpenWRt supports any of them= =2E <br /><br />I guess this happens also due to the amount of flash and RA= M memory those devices have. <br /><br />And - if you're going for the RE45= 0, keep in mind it's u-boot doesn't seem to have any recovery method, so so= ldering an UART right away maybe a good option. <br /><br />Enrico <br /><b= r />_______________________________________________ <br />openwrt-devel mai= ling list <br /><a class=3D"v1moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:open= wrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org" rel=3D"noreferrer">openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt= =2Eorg</a> <br /><a class=3D"v1moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"https://lists= =2Eopenwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noo= pener noreferrer">https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel<= /a> <br /><br /></blockquote> <p>RE450 is Wifi-only.<br />There is actually one supported:</p> <p><a class=3D"v1moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"https://openwrt.org/toh/hwd= ata/tp-link/tp-link_tl-wpa8630" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener noreferre= r">https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/tp-link/tp-link_tl-wpa8630</a></p> <pre class=3D"v1moz-signature">--=20 Pozdrawiam, Lech Perczak </pre> </div> </div> <br /> <div class=3D"pre" style=3D"margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">= _______________________________________________<br />openwrt-devel mailing = list<br /><a href=3D"mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org">openwrt-devel@= lists.openwrt.org</a><br /><a href=3D"https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/lis= tinfo/openwrt-devel" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener noreferrer">https://= lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel</a></div> </blockquote> </body></html> --=_c8986d6f2b8bd786ed73dde266b422b6-- ]