[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:55:19 2020 Received: from grosjo.net ([94.130.37.163]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hvdSo-0000pl-If for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:08:00 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=grosjo.net; s=dkim; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=A2yLoy8obANNeuRB7ck64mz0pX+I6wwj78cPRNlaZws=; b=izZG0tWS8s2Ta1DiRyhjVrytmK 7BRrYpqSqifQxW/uWBVTtimTp0GvVeYxxoRk3/QXtKzHQwa2XqDz6VeZ+1H0wcBHPaDRDePlSD8Xv kP6l1qRrobYVJGP0kFQjc/P86O0VXfOWEFREk+swVjp96gH49f94lJXpL6KxwE+quqc0=; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=grosjo.net) by grosjo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.92.1) (envelope-from <jom@grosjo.net>) id 1hvdSg-000522-VM; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:07:52 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_6dda6300f90b4cf78a08754c51e5be7f" Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:07:50 +0800 From: Joan Moreau <jom@grosjo.net> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Petr_=C5=A0tetiar?= <ynezz@true.cz> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] package mt76 fails to compile under certain configuration [Was: Compilation error on master / mt7620] In-Reply-To: <20190803202740.GA12735@meh.true.cz> References: <mailman.13754.1564703810.19300.openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> <20190802103653.GP74752@meh.true.cz> <2a6780799fb7077e5d731337bcfadbe0@grosjo.net> <b13b66b94fb80ac49631e0e2dc971c60@grosjo.net> <20190803202740.GA12735@meh.true.cz> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4-git Message-ID: <207986d3aba008adb535367421e0f5fb@grosjo.net> X-Sender: jom@grosjo.net X-GJ: Sent from localhost X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "gjserver", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see admin@grosjo.net for details. Content preview: ok and what about the JFFS2 not compiled properly (searching for zlib instead of LZMA) ? On 2019-08-04 04:27, Petr Štetiar wrote: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-GJ-SMTP: h_FROM = Joan Moreau <jom@grosjo.net> RPATH=jom@grosjo.net SENDERADR= jom@grosjo.net: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190808_010758_770334_85616AD9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( -1.14 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [94.130.37.163 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid --=_6dda6300f90b4cf78a08754c51e5be7f Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed ok=20 and what about the JFFS2 not compiled properly (searching for zlib instead of LZMA) ? On 2019-08-04 04:27, Petr =C5=A0tetiar wrote: > Joan Moreau <jom@grosjo.net> [2019-08-02 21:37:17]: >=20 >> Removing "debug fs" in compilation options removes the problem. >=20 > It was caused by CONFIG_KERNEL_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=3Dy >=20 >> So there is something very awkward in the Makefile >=20 > Should be fixed in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1141597/ >=20 > -- ynezz --=_6dda6300f90b4cf78a08754c51e5be7f Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset= =3DUTF-8" /></head><body style=3D'font-size: 9pt; font-family: Verdana,Gene= va,sans-serif'> <p>ok</p> <p>and what about the JFFS2 not compiled properly (searching for zlib inste= ad of LZMA) ?</p> <div id=3D"signature"> </div> <p><br /></p> <p id=3D"reply-intro">On 2019-08-04 04:27, Petr Štetiar wrote:</p> <blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2= px solid; margin: 0"> <div class=3D"pre" style=3D"margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">= Joan Moreau <<a href=3D"mailto:jom@grosjo.net">jom@grosjo.net</a>> [2= 019-08-02 21:37:17]:<br /><br /> <blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2= px solid; margin: 0">Removing "debug fs" in compilation options removes the= problem.</blockquote> <br />It was caused by CONFIG_KERNEL_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=3Dy<br /><br /> <blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2= px solid; margin: 0">So there is something very awkward in the Makefile</bl= ockquote> <br />Should be fixed in <a href=3D"https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1141= 597/" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener noreferrer">https://patchwork.ozlab= s.org/patch/1141597/</a><br /><br />-- ynezz<br /><br /></div> </blockquote> </body></html> --=_6dda6300f90b4cf78a08754c51e5be7f-- ]