[From nobody Thu Jun 25 05:54:59 2020
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1geOzU-0002KR-0y
 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 18:42:13 +0000
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c206so23731599oib.0
 for &lt;openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org&gt;; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 10:42:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=MZnBi0cCCIkBdA4iFZzwktB/baOAL6bdPDd6T8mlBI4=;
 b=YxXD9e/1xH8K8gmEaA3PwUjnxDVCkWZTHm9PybXLoNFmHCa5+UtOlUSY0MinuaevcU
 sTAtdbpuiQq1oi1F1oWSGoWxD7uajAmA5bnZ1pVlxcO/MU+vZFyzlCmxTmuVatK6uFXk
 4qsm0lf8jFSxgZPgXamRJtlk4jZ4Ir1kC1Pv0JA4qSm+qyiiQRla3odH+y0G/iVxoQir
 PGOECmyru84hiF6XtkotLnSpMoxaVkEtIxoYmBkC5qwkb+rwYk3ZAX2RhZV3Wm6VG+4u
 GKR/hTFwytNcVhQh5P3fwJp0jiW0aXo4idXP/TR2DnvJi0NsfvHAqzEQY+upPnRvh2wp
 WQ2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=MZnBi0cCCIkBdA4iFZzwktB/baOAL6bdPDd6T8mlBI4=;
 b=jCJEBDpoer15RkvMEI+8RoZ5M0H4If+7Oly+dfshOsHVkHTqa3MsNd/AuiI9lXkMwU
 z7jYFrO6wKKHVReagyIzr0OcMyWiP9Ep9uIAvZCDmErbR5djxsVTSICMBuKlo07w+W2v
 1oe68+YR/8MISyjSnOW4+LQ8A8GrFpbEpyS5CZr5KDa7ua6Zb6I7DqTpX1c0l/KWLgPr
 ihNm8olcki9wgEBNkYGY5d77RgL7vac9X3v4G8iaQeKLm8+hj5zH8Av5fkvoBFLCMbUR
 5wUoJjvq2RhqMmG9KY9P2nukVHPA3kccLW/gZ4MKV6F4R49/pzzdBSQdl0To1WBtABGO
 YmYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZKdiX4KmlsePixyaVPSK1Jrog1rNGvMpmQ9SP3V/bWsq7Is6Wk
 AZy3Iw3Ja+5PFEKpFlmijmT6nqlOiaKqI/jXtes=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/W0rLgMtjGfRTVf54JW3tJ9noGPlyjg5/PDXxd4z7CRt3X8z9PXp0059WK4E84rcZcvXWp4djH9kp61uXNTQQw=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:4f86:: with SMTP id g6mr27031890oiy.205.1546368130303; 
 Tue, 01 Jan 2019 10:42:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: &lt;mailman.12301.1546344197.2376.openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org&gt;
 &lt;1598947.zDYpSldJ0Q@debian64&gt;
In-Reply-To: &lt;1598947.zDYpSldJ0Q@debian64&gt;
From: Christoph Krapp &lt;achterin@googlemail.com&gt;
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 19:41:55 +0100
Message-ID: &lt;CAEQ_PoyeUgbGOoSzQQSOmiyVn3ebqoG9=RhDQcSb8rxx9CduNQ@mail.gmail.com&gt;
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: align GL-AR750S boardname to other
 GL.iNet devices
To: Christian Lamparter &lt;chunkeey@gmail.com&gt;
Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;UTF-8&quot;
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190101_104212_137456_37FC98F9 
X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE (   8.61  )
X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message.
X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary:
 Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (achterin[at]googlemail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:22d listed in]
 [list.dnswl.org]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
 valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 author's domain

&gt; I had this problem (DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy) in the past as well.
&gt; If you want to fix it you need to convert your account from googlemail.com
&gt; to gmail.com (and update your git config and commits to reflect the change).
Thx for the hint. Will try that next time.

&gt; The &quot;Device/glinet_ar750s&quot; change to &quot;Device/glinet_gl-ar750s&quot; will likely
&gt; break sysupgrade from existing &quot;glinet_ar750s&quot; images. This is because the
&gt; now deprecated glinet_ar750s identifier was not added to the
&gt; SUPPORTED_DEVICES variable. Other than that, it looks good.
As the support for this device got merged 2 days ago i don't think its
that important.
Furthermore commits like 8ba76d6 &amp; 6e78d54 got merged without the requested
addition, even tough these devices are support way longer.

Regards,
Christoph

]