<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Felix Fietkau <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nbd@openwrt.org" target="_blank">nbd@openwrt.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 2014-11-23 23:03, Weedy wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Nov 23, 2014 4:35 PM, "Weedy" <<a href="mailto:weedy2887@gmail.com">weedy2887@gmail.com</a><br>
</span><span class="">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:weedy2887@gmail.com">weedy2887@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Nov 19, 2014 8:47 AM, "John Crispin" <<a href="mailto:blogic@openwrt.org">blogic@openwrt.org</a><br>
</span><span class="">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:blogic@openwrt.org">blogic@openwrt.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On 19/11/2014 14:44, Weedy wrote:<br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > On Oct 30, 2014 5:08 PM, "Heiner Kallweit" <<a href="mailto:hkallweit1@gmail.com">hkallweit1@gmail.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:hkallweit1@gmail.com">hkallweit1@gmail.com</a>><br>
</span><div><div class="h5">>> > > <mailto:<a href="mailto:hkallweit1@gmail.com">hkallweit1@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:hkallweit1@gmail.com">hkallweit1@gmail.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> Am 30.10.2014 um 07:22 schrieb Heiner Kallweit:<br>
>> > >> > Am 30.10.2014 um 03:36 schrieb Florian Fainelli:<br>
>> > >> >> Le 28/10/2014 11:46, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :<br>
>> > >> >>> After a little more thinking about it and looking at the code I<br>
>> > > basically have two questions:<br>
>> > >> >>><br>
>> > >> >>> 1.<br>
>> > >> >>> Is it actually needed to exclude certain phy's in<br>
>> > > ar8xxx_phy_config_aneg?<br>
>> > >> >>> (At least for AR8327 it doesn't get called with an addr != 0<br>
> anyway)<br>
>> > >> >>> Else we could remove ar8xxx_phy_config_aneg and directly register<br>
>> > > genphy_config_aneg as<br>
>> > >> >>> callback for autoneg configuration.<br>
>> > >> >><br>
>> > >> >> Address 0 is special, since this is a MDIO broadcast address that<br>
>> > > will usually be handled by switches as "write to all front-panel<br>
> ports".<br>
>> > >> >><br>
>> > >> >>><br>
>> > >> >>> 2.<br>
>> > >> >>> Call sequence with regard to ar8216 is:<br>
>> > >> >>> ar8216: ar8xxx_phy_probe<br>
>> > >> >>> phy: phy_attach_direct<br>
>> > >> >>> phy: phy_init_hw<br>
>> > >> >>> ar8216: ar8xxx_phy_config_init<br>
>> > >> >>> ar8216: ar8xxx_phy_config_aneg<br>
>> > >> >>><br>
>> > >> >>> ar8216 driver handles AR8327/AR8337 different from the other<br>
>> > > supported switch types.<br>
>> > >> >>> ar8xxx_start incl. more detailed configuration is called from<br>
>> > > ar8xxx_phy_probe already.<br>
>> > >> >>> For the other switch types it's called from<br>
> ar8xxx_phy_config_init.<br>
>> > >> >>><br>
>> > >> >>> I wonder whether doing detailed configuration in the probe stage<br>
>> > > might be too early.<br>
>> > >> >>> phy_init_hw resets the switch anyway later.<br>
>> > >> >>> Doing the detailed setup in ar8xxx_phy_config_init seems to be<br>
>> > > more suited however<br>
>> > >> >>> there might be good reason why it's handled the way it is.<br>
>> > >> >><br>
>> > >> >> I suppose that you could re-advertise auto-negotiation by calling<br>
>> > > genphy_config_advert() in the config_init routine.<br>
>> > >> ><br>
>> > >> > The actual problem is caused by BMCR_ANENABLE being cleared by the<br>
>> > > reset in phy_init_hw.<br>
>> > >> > As far as I can see genphy_config_advert doesn't bring back<br>
> this flag.<br>
>> > >> > What does genphy_config_aneg mainly do?<br>
>> > >> > - call genphy_config_advert<br>
>> > >> > - check if BMCR_ANENABLE is set<br>
>> > >> > - if it's not, call genphy_restart_aneg<br>
>> > >> > Therefore, to bring back BMCR_ANENABLE, we have to call<br>
>> > > genphy_config_aneg or genphy_restart_aneg.<br>
>> > >> > genphy_restart_aneg most likely is sufficient, however I don't see<br>
>> > > that genphy_config_aneg<br>
>> > >> > can do any harm if being called with addr == 0.<br>
>> > >> > At least for me it works perfectly fine to call genphy_config_aneg<br>
>> > > for all addr's.<br>
>> > >> ><br>
>> > >> > Rgds, Heiner<br>
>> > >> ><br>
>> > >> >><br>
>> > >> >>><br>
>> > >> >>> Rgds,<br>
>> > >> >>> Heiner<br>
>> > >> >>><br>
>> > >> >>><br>
>> > >> >>> Am 27.10.2014 um 22:00 schrieb Heiner Kallweit:<br>
>> > >> >>>> With two different TPLINK routers (both with a AR8327N switch) I<br>
>> > > faced the issue that with<br>
>> > >> >>>> kernel 3.14 certain switch ports used 10MBit/half only.<br>
>> > >> >>>> Under kernel 3.10 everything was fine and the same ports used<br>
>> > > 1000MBit/full.<br>
>> > >> >>>><br>
>> > >> >>>> As the ar8216 driver is the same I had a look at the common phy<br>
>> > > code in drivers/net/phy.<br>
>> > >> >>>> In function phy_init_hw in phy_device.c kernel 3.14 resets the<br>
>> > > phy whilst 3.10 does not.<br>
>> > >> >>>><br>
>> > >> >>>> The issue turned out to be that when resetting only flag<br>
>> > > BMCR_RESET is set, not BMCR_ANENABLE.<br>
>> > >> >>>> (In ar8216.c always both flags are set when the switch is reset)<br>
>> > >> >>>> Therefore autoneg was not enabled. Also later in the boot<br>
> process<br>
>> > > it doesn't get enabled.<br>
>> > >> >>>> Adding BMCR_ANENABLE solved the problem and now also under 3.14<br>
>> > > all ports use 1000MBit/full.<br>
>> > >> >>>><br>
>> > >> >>>> However I'm not sure whether it's a poper fix to add<br>
>> > > BMCR_ANENABLE in this generic phy function.<br>
>> > >> >>>> It might not be appropriate for other phy's.<br>
>> > >> >>>><br>
>> > >> >>>> After resetting the switch later in the boot process<br>
>> > > ar8xxx_phy_config_aneg is called with<br>
>> > >> >>>> phydev->addr being 0.<br>
>> > >> >>>> In this case the function returns immediately. Otherwise it<br>
> would<br>
>> > > call genphy_config_aneg.<br>
>> > >> >>>> Calling genphy_config_aneg would also solve the problem as it<br>
>> > > checks for BMCR_ANENABLE<br>
>> > >> >>>> being set and sets it if needed.<br>
>> > >> >>>> I don't know the reason why genphy_config_aneg isn't called in<br>
>> > > case of addr 0.<br>
>> > >> >>>> Or is this a typo and the check actually should be addr != 0 ?<br>
>> > >> >>>><br>
>> > >> >>>> Rgds, Heiner<br>
>> > >> >>>><br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> The following rudimentary patch works fine for me with kernel<br>
> <span tabindex="0" class=""><span class="">3.14.18</span></span> on<br>
>> > >> TP-LINK TL-WDR4900 (mpc85xx with AR8327Nv4)<br>
>> > >> TP-LINK TL-WDR4300 ( ar71xx with AR8327Nv2)<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> Apart from using genphy_config_aneg also for addr==0 I replaced<br>
>> > > msleep(1000)<br>
>> > >> with a polling function inspired by phy_poll_reset in phy_device.c<br>
>> > >> On AR8327 the reset actually takes less than 20ms. Sleeping for<br>
> 1000ms<br>
>> > >> seems to be a waste of time.<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> Little more work would be needed to make it a proper patch:<br>
>> > >> - move ar8xxx_phy_poll_reset more to the beginning so that it is<br>
> defined<br>
>> > >> before being used in any xxxx_hw_init function<br>
>> > >> - replace msleep(1000) also in the other xxxx_hw_init functions<br>
>> > >> - remove pr_info debug message or make it at least pr_dbg<br>
>> > >> - insert some comments<br>
>> > >> - use git format-patch output<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> Rgds, Heiner<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> --- ar8216.c.orig 2014-10-30 21:50:19.999723156 +0100<br>
>> > >> +++ ar8216.c 2014-10-30 21:42:11.996481099 +0100<br>
>> > >> @@ -1591,6 +1591,29 @@<br>
>> > >> #endif<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> static int<br>
>> > >> +ar8xxx_phy_poll_reset(struct mii_bus *bus, int num_phys)<br>
>> > >> +{<br>
>> > >> + unsigned int sleep_msecs = 20;<br>
>> > >> + int ret, elapsed, i;<br>
>> > >> +<br>
>> > >> + for(elapsed = sleep_msecs; elapsed <= 600; elapsed +=<br>
>> > > sleep_msecs) {<br>
>> > >> + msleep(sleep_msecs);<br>
>> > >> + for (i = 0; i < num_phys; i++) {<br>
>> > >> + ret = mdiobus_read(bus, i, MII_BMCR);<br>
>> > >> + if (ret < 0) return ret;<br>
>> > >> + if (ret & BMCR_RESET) break;<br>
>> > >> + if (i == num_phys - 1) {<br>
>> > >> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);<br>
>> > >> + pr_info("ar8xxx_phy_poll_reset<br>
>> > > finished in %u ms\n",<br>
>> > >> + elapsed);<br>
>> > >> + return 0;<br>
>> > >> + }<br>
>> > >> + }<br>
>> > >> + }<br>
>> > >> + return -ETIMEDOUT;<br>
>> > >> +}<br>
>> > >> +<br>
>> > >> +static int<br>
>> > >> ar8327_hw_init(struct ar8xxx_priv *priv)<br>
>> > >> {<br>
>> > >> struct mii_bus *bus;<br>
>> > >> @@ -1620,7 +1643,7 @@<br>
>> > >> mdiobus_write(bus, i, MII_BMCR, BMCR_RESET |<br>
>> > > BMCR_ANENABLE);<br>
>> > >> }<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> - msleep(1000);<br>
>> > >> + ar8xxx_phy_poll_reset(bus, AR8327_NUM_PHYS);<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> return 0;<br>
>> > >> }<br>
>> > >> @@ -2840,15 +2863,6 @@<br>
>> > >> return ret;<br>
>> > >> }<br>
>> > >><br>
>> > >> -static int<br>
>> > >> -ar8xxx_phy_config_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)<br>
>> > >> -{<br>
>> > >> - if (phydev->addr == 0)<br>
>> > >> - return 0;<br>
>> > >> -<br>
>> > >> - return genphy_config_aneg(phydev);<br>
>> > >> -}<br>
>> > >> -<br>
>> > >> static const u32 ar8xxx_phy_ids[] = {<br>
>> > >> 0x004dd033,<br>
>> > >> 0x004dd034, /* AR8327 */<br>
>> > >> @@ -3020,7 +3034,7 @@<br>
>> > >> .remove = ar8xxx_phy_remove,<br>
>> > >> .detach = ar8xxx_phy_detach,<br>
>> > >> .config_init = ar8xxx_phy_config_init,<br>
>> > >> - .config_aneg = ar8xxx_phy_config_aneg,<br>
>> > >> + .config_aneg = genphy_config_aneg,<br>
>> > >> .read_status = ar8xxx_phy_read_status,<br>
>> > >> .driver = { .owner = THIS_MODULE },<br>
>> > >> };<br>
>> > >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> > >> openwrt-devel mailing list<br>
>> > >> <a href="mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org">openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org">openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org</a>><br>
</div></div>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org">openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org</a><br>
<span class="">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org">openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org</a>>><br>
>> > >> <a href="https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel</a><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > I feel like this shouldn't die off in the depths of the ML<br>
>> > ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > we had a call about it today, this patch and the other ar821x patches<br>
>> > will be handled soon<br>
>><br>
>> You guys bumped trunk to 3.14 but didn't fix this.<br>
><br>
> It's also broken in 43342.<br>
><br>
> For me this manifests as the WAN port is stuck at 1000T so my 100T DSL<br>
> modem doesn't exist. Lucky I keep spare switches around.<br>
</span>On what device is it broken for you? I did apply Heiner Kallweit's<br>
fixes, and it worked for me.<br>
<br>
- Felix</blockquote></div>The problem with the non-working WAN port was reported to me also by others.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Using genphy_config_aneg with phy 0 seems to cause this.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">The following fix which I sent Nov 21st is still waiting to be applied.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>ar8216: Fix issue with autoneg being disabled under 3.14, revert 43332<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Heiner<br></div></div>