Policy for AI Coding Assistants

[Michael Richardson]

Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de> wrote:
    > I think OpenWrt does not have a policy regarding AI Coding Assistants. I
    > started using them and I always mentioned it in the commit message.

    > I am pretty sure others used them too on code contributed to OpenWrt.

    > I would like to take over the policy from the Linux kernel regarding AI
    > Coding Assistants:
    > https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-assistants.html

    > I would like to use these rules for OpenWrt:

To this, I would add: bug reports, particularly security related ones, MUST
include PoC.  Maybe this is less critical for OpenWRT, and is more of an
upstream concern, but my experience is that the PoC is a useful filter that
helps with:

    > * The contributor must understand what the code does

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr at sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
]       My working hours and your working hours may be different.            [
]  Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours   [

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20260417/b702b7f1/attachment.sig>