[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] wireguard: bump to 0.0.20181006

Lucian Cristian luci at powerneth.ro
Mon Oct 8 14:12:53 EDT 2018


On 08.10.2018 11:56, Andre Heider wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 06/10/2018 05:09, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> diff --git a/package/network/services/wireguard/Makefile 
>> b/package/network/services/wireguard/Makefile
>> index 29c7447..3544e34 100644
>> --- a/package/network/services/wireguard/Makefile
>> +++ b/package/network/services/wireguard/Makefile
>> @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/kernel.mk
>>     PKG_NAME:=wireguard
>>   -PKG_VERSION:=0.0.20180925
>> +PKG_VERSION:=0.0.20181006
>
>
> with this version I get a build error on arm:
>
>   CC [M] 
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/main.o
> In file included from 
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/crypto/include/zinc/chacha20poly1305.h:9:0,
>                  from 
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/messages.h:10,
>                  from 
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/noise.h:8,
>                  from 
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/device.h:9,
>                  from 
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/main.c:7:
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/compat/simd/include/linux/simd.h: 
> In function 'simd_get':
> /home/andre/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/linux-sunxi_cortexa7/WireGuard-0.0.20181006/src/compat/simd/include/linux/simd.h:29:48: 
> error: implicit declaration of function 'may_use_simd'; did you mean 
> 'cap_settime'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   *ctx = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE) && may_use_simd() ? 
> HAVE_FULL_SIMD : HAVE_NO_SIMD;
>                                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>                                                 cap_settime
>
> Thanks,
> Andre
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

there's a new one 07, it's about this problem


Regards


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list