[OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

[mbm]

Am I correct in assuming that this is also a statement that the LEDE 
members will assist in accomplishing the tasks mentioned?


On 6/27/2016 2:39 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev
> and waited for a while to solicit more feedback.
>
> Since no other people expressed further wishes and since you repeatedly
> asked for a list of things the LEDE folks would like to see in OpenWrt
> I'm going to summarize the list the items we've assembled in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-adm/2016-June/000144.html
>
> In short our points are (in no particular order):
>
>   - Use the LEDE code base
>   - Adopt the LEDE governance rules
>   - Rework admin access policies
>   - Transfer the OpenWrt project domain to SPI
>   - Stop providing project email addresses
>   - Move mailing lists to an external, neutral provider
>   - Merge LEDE and OpenWrt infrastructure (wiki, forum, ...)
>   - Start a process for granting push access to package feed maintainers
>
> Plus a few other items which got mentioned or agreed upon during various
> discussions:
>
>   - Dissolve private channels
>   - Discuss project matters on public mailing lists
>
>
> Note that the points above reflect mostly the opinions of Felix, John
> and me. Other LEDE members might or might not endorse them, but at least
> did not reject those demands.
>
> Let me know if some of the things above are unclear to you.
>
> Regards,
> Jo
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel