[PATCH v4 0/6] platform: generic: spacemit: add K3 platform support

[Troy Mitchell]

On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 05:28:31PM -0700, E Shattow wrote:
> I did suggest the change to be included by the vendor as a pull request:
>
> https://github.com/spacemit-com/uboot-2022.10/pull/5
>
> However I do not expect this to be considered, as the vendor uses their
> own fork of OpenSBI.

I've already passed your PR to the team responsible for our U-Boot tree
for review.

> [...]
>
> Although I was unable boot a Linux userland from vendor 'FSBL.bin' plus
> the mainline in-development 'u-boot.itb' the Linux kernel appears mostly
> functional and does output some messages up to the point of 'init'.
> There is no dependency on any SPI NOR flash content at all, it can be
> fully erased and the 'esos' 'FSBL' 'opensbi' 'uboot' NOR flash regions
> are not involved in testing when loading in-development for mainline
> U-Boot (including mainline OpenSBI fw_dynamic.bin) 'u-boot.itb' and
> whatever SPL (currently the vendor SDK/BSP 'FSBL.bin' SPL) is required
> by that.

My COM260 test reached a shell with the SDK U-Boot and a minimal
initramfs. Could you share the full boot log, U-Boot and kernel
revisions, and the DT and kernel command line you used?

> [...]
>
> I did read through all the patches in this series for any obvious style
> problems. For the series with no endorsement of suitability for what the
> code does or how it does so, okay to apply my R-by tag (and/or
> Tested-by) and with or without any trivial style corrections as requested.

I've dropped the redundant cache-flush comment in patch 2 and used BIT()
in the K1 nascent hook in patch 3.

Thanks for the review, testing and tags.

-- 
Troy Mitchell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/opensbi/attachments/20261023/f522d811/attachment.sig>