[PATCH] atomics: fix AMO test macros
Xiang W
wxjstz at 126.com
Thu Dec 25 04:36:53 PST 2025
在 2025-12-25四的 13:18 +0200,Vladimir Kondratiev写道:
> The "RISC-V C API" [1] defines architecture extension test macros
> says naming rule for the test macros is __riscv_<ext_name>,
> where <ext_name> is all lower-case.
> 3 extensions dealing with atomics implementation,
> "zaamo" consists of AMO instructions, "zalrsc" - LR/SC,
> "a" extension means both "zaamo" and "zalrsc"
> Test macros are __riscv_a, __riscv_zaamo and __riscv_zalrsc.
> Alternative to the __riscv_a macro name, __riscv_atomic, is deprecated.
>
> Use correct test macro __riscv_zaamo for the AMO variant of atomics.
> It used to be __riscv_atomic that is both deprecated and incorrect
> because it tests for the "a" extension; i.e. both "zaamo" and "zalrsc"
> If ISA enables only zaamo but not zalrsc, code as it was would not compile.
>
> [1] https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev at mobileye.com>
> ---
> firmware/fw_base.S | 2 +-
> firmware/payloads/test_head.S | 2 +-
> lib/sbi/riscv_atomic.c | 8 ++++----
> lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c | 2 +-
> lib/sbi/sbi_illegal_atomic.c | 6 +++---
> 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/firmware/fw_base.S b/firmware/fw_base.S
> index 5300ecf22e0c..9fbe2b870974 100644
> --- a/firmware/fw_base.S
> +++ b/firmware/fw_base.S
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ _try_lottery:
> /* Jump to relocation wait loop if we don't get relocation lottery */
> lla a6, _boot_lottery
> li a7, BOOT_LOTTERY_ACQUIRED
> -#ifdef __riscv_atomic
> +#ifdef __riscv_zaamo
Older toolchains may not have `__riscv_zaamo`, so it's recommended to use
`#if defined(__riscv_atomic) || defined(__riscv_zaamo)`.
Regards,
Xiang W
> amoswap.w a6, a7, (a6)
> bnez a6, _wait_for_boot_hart
> #elif __riscv_zalrsc
> diff --git a/firmware/payloads/test_head.S b/firmware/payloads/test_head.S
> index 070ce8aa98be..aa20a13f4b89 100644
> --- a/firmware/payloads/test_head.S
> +++ b/firmware/payloads/test_head.S
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ _start:
> /* Pick one hart to run the main boot sequence */
> lla a3, _hart_lottery
> li a2, 1
> -#ifdef __riscv_atomic
> +#ifdef __riscv_zaamo
> amoadd.w a3, a2, (a3)
> #elif __riscv_zalrsc
> _sc_fail:
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/riscv_atomic.c b/lib/sbi/riscv_atomic.c
> index df16a2eb159e..7935ca9c642c 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/riscv_atomic.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/riscv_atomic.c
> @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
> #include <sbi/riscv_atomic.h>
> #include <sbi/riscv_barrier.h>
>
> -#if !defined(__riscv_atomic) && !defined(__riscv_zalrsc)
> -#error "opensbi strongly relies on the A extension of RISC-V"
> +#if !defined(__riscv_zaamo) && !defined(__riscv_zalrsc)
> +#error "opensbi strongly relies on the zaamo or zalrsc extension of RISC-V"
> #endif
>
> long atomic_read(atomic_t *atom)
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ void atomic_write(atomic_t *atom, long value)
>
> long atomic_add_return(atomic_t *atom, long value)
> {
> -#ifdef __riscv_atomic
> +#ifdef __riscv_zaamo
> long ret;
> #if __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4
> __asm__ __volatile__(" amoadd.w.aqrl %1, %2, %0"
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ long atomic_sub_return(atomic_t *atom, long value)
> return atomic_add_return(atom, -value);
> }
>
> -#ifdef __riscv_atomic
> +#ifdef __riscv_zaamo
> #define __axchg(ptr, new, size) \
> ({ \
> __typeof__(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); \
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c b/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c
> index 41e8fabd08be..2e4789365962 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
>
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> /* Atomically increment the next ticket. */
> -#ifdef __riscv_atomic
> +#ifdef __riscv_zaamo
> " amoadd.w.aqrl %0, %4, %3\n"
> #elif __riscv_zalrsc
> "3: lr.w.aqrl %0, %3\n"
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_illegal_atomic.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_illegal_atomic.c
> index 8fd6c5575bfb..12bc438c87c0 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_illegal_atomic.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_illegal_atomic.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
> #include <sbi/sbi_illegal_atomic.h>
> #include <sbi/sbi_illegal_insn.h>
>
> -#if !defined(__riscv_atomic) && !defined(__riscv_zalrsc)
> -#error "opensbi strongly relies on the A extension of RISC-V"
> +#if !defined(__riscv_zaamo) && !defined(__riscv_zalrsc)
> +#error "opensbi strongly relies on the AMO or LR/SC extension of RISC-V"
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef __riscv_atomic
> +#ifdef __riscv_zaamo
>
> int sbi_illegal_atomic(ulong insn, struct sbi_trap_regs *regs)
> {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
More information about the opensbi
mailing list