[PATCH] lib: sbi: Add missing sscrind and sscfg extensions in sbi_hart_ext[]

[Andreas Schwab]

On Mär 20 2024, Clément Léger wrote:

> The sbi_hart_ext[] array is missing these two extensions ids. It is
> expected that this array contains all the extensions declaration at the
> same index of the SBI_HART_EXT_* define. Without this, when adding a new
> extension, there is a mismatch between ids and extension names and it
> can even display corrupted extension names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger at rivosinc.com>
>
> ---
>  lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c
> index 3d13694..d68e2a0 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c
> @@ -666,6 +666,8 @@ const struct sbi_hart_ext_data sbi_hart_ext[] = {
>  	__SBI_HART_EXT_DATA(sdtrig, SBI_HART_EXT_SDTRIG),
>  	__SBI_HART_EXT_DATA(smcsrind, SBI_HART_EXT_SMCSRIND),
>  	__SBI_HART_EXT_DATA(smcdeleg, SBI_HART_EXT_SMCDELEG),
> +	__SBI_HART_EXT_DATA(sscsrind, SBI_HART_EXT_SSCSRIND),
> +	__SBI_HART_EXT_DATA(ssccfg, SBI_HART_EXT_SSCCFG),
>  };

Please add a static_assert to verify that the size of sbi_hart_ext
agrees with SBI_HART_EXT_MAX.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab at suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."