[RFC PATCH 1/1] lib: sbi: fix dbtr shmem address handling

[Xiang W]

在 2024-06-25星期二的 23:26 +0300，Sergey Matyukevich写道：
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 09:12:05AM +0800, Xiang W wrote:
> > 在 2024-06-25星期二的 00:13 +0300，Sergey Matyukevich写道：
> > > Current debug triggers implementation in OpenSBI is accompanied by the
> > > Linux kernel PoC code available on github, e.g. see the last two branches:
> > > 
> > > - https://github.com/hschauhan/riscv-linux/blob/linux-6.8-rc5-sdtrig
> > > - https://github.com/hschauhan/riscv-linux/tree/sdtrig-virt
> > > 
> > > All implementation versions suggest a common way to pass shared memory
> > > address to OpenSBI on RV32 and RV64 platforms. Shmem address is split
> > > into two 32-bit parts and passed using two registers in SBI call.
> > https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/src/ext-debug-console.adoc?plain=1#L31C35-L33C53
> > 
> > The shmem address is not split into high 32 bits and low 32 bits, but high
> > XLEN bits and low XLEN bits
> 
> This RFC is for DBTR (debug trigger) and not for DBCN (debug console).
> In this case Linux kernel PoC implementation performs split, see:
> 
> - https://github.com/hschauhan/riscv-linux/blob/linux-6.8-rc5-sdtrig/arch/riscv/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c#L30-L58
> 
> But your remark regarding XLEN is applicable to DBTR case as well. Debug
> Trigger Extension is not yet in SBI specification. Its proposal is
> posted in riscv tech-debug mailing list:
> 
> - https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-debug/message/1302
> 
> This proposal suggests to handle shmem address in sbi_debug_setup_shmem
> in a similar way as addresses in DBCN read/write. So current Linux
> kernel DBTR PoC code needs to be fixed along the following lines:
> 
> :	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> :		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_DBTR, SBI_EXT_DBTR_SETUP_SHMEM,
> :				lower_32_bits(base_addr), upper_32_bits(base_addr);
> :				0, 0, 0, 0);
> :	else
> :		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_DBTR, SBI_EXT_DBTR_SETUP_SHMEM,
> :				base_addr, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> 
> Meanwhile OpenSBI fix is still needed to do the following two things:
> - to check that upper address word is zero (makes sense for both RV32/RV64)
> - to drop upper address word from DBTR_SHMEM_MAKE_PHYS (for RV32)
> 
> The updated RFC patch is as follows:
> 
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c
> index 9c92af6..9aab015 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_dbtr.c
> @@ -47,13 +47,7 @@ static unsigned long hart_state_ptr_offset;
>  	     _idx < _max;						\
>  	     _idx++, _entry = ((_etype *)_base + _idx))
>  
> -#if __riscv_xlen == 64
>  #define DBTR_SHMEM_MAKE_PHYS(_p_hi, _p_lo) (_p_lo)
> -#elif __riscv_xlen == 32
> -#define DBTR_SHMEM_MAKE_PHYS(_p_hi, _p_lo) (((u64)(_p_hi) << 32) | (_p_lo))
> -#else
> -#error "Undefined XLEN"
> -#endif
>  
>  /* must call with hs != NULL */
>  static inline bool sbi_dbtr_shmem_disabled(
> @@ -277,6 +271,9 @@ int sbi_dbtr_setup_shmem(const struct sbi_domain *dom, unsigned long smode,
>  	if (shmem_phys_lo & SBI_DBTR_SHMEM_ALIGN_MASK)
>  		return SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
>  
> +	if (shmem_phys_hi)
> +		return SBI_EINVALID_ADDR;
> +
>  	if (dom && !sbi_domain_check_addr(dom,
>  		  DBTR_SHMEM_MAKE_PHYS(shmem_phys_hi, shmem_phys_lo), smode,
>  		  SBI_DOMAIN_READ | SBI_DOMAIN_WRITE))
> 
> Regards,
> Sergey
New patch look good to me.

Regards,
Xiang W