[PATCH v2] lib: utils/serial: Optimize semihosting_putc implementation
Xiang W
wxjstz at 126.com
Mon Oct 23 01:22:03 PDT 2023
在 2023-10-23星期一的 14:35 +0800，Guo Ren写道：
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:42 AM <cp0613 at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chen Pei <cp0613 at linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > For some debuggers that do not implement SYSWRITEC and SYSREADC
> > operations, we can use SYSWRITE and SYSREAD instead like the
> > implementation of semihosting_getc().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Pei <cp0613 at linux.alibaba.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Xiang W <wxjstz at 126.com>
> >
> > Changed from v1:
> > 1. simplified by calling semihosting_puts directly.
> >
> > ---
> > lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c b/lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c
> > index ce65887..a27c69e 100644
> > --- a/lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c
> > +++ b/lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c
> > @@ -160,11 +160,6 @@ static long semihosting_write(long fd, const void *memp, size_t len)
> >
> > /* clang-format on */
> >
> > -static void semihosting_putc(char ch)
> > -{
> > - semihosting_trap(SYSWRITEC, &ch);
> > -}
> > -
> > static unsigned long semihosting_puts(const char *str, unsigned long len)
> > {
> > char ch;
> > @@ -183,6 +178,11 @@ static unsigned long semihosting_puts(const char *str, unsigned long len)
> > return (ret < 0) ? 0 : ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static void semihosting_putc(char ch)
> > +{
> > + semihosting_puts(&ch, 1);
> > +}
> > +
> When console_puts() was introduced by commit c43903c4eae41 ("lib: sbi:
> Add console_puts() callback in the console device"), sbi_putc() became
> unnecessary and confusing. See below code:
>
> void sbi_putc(char ch)
> {
> if (console_dev && console_dev->console_putc) {
> if (ch == '\n')
> console_dev->console_putc('\r');
> console_dev->console_putc(ch);
> }
> }
>
> static unsigned long nputs(const char *str, unsigned long len)
> {
> unsigned long i, ret;
>
> if (console_dev && console_dev->console_puts) {
> ret = console_dev->console_puts(str, len);
> } else {
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> sbi_putc(str[i]);
> ret = len;
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> Actually, sbi_putc() is duplicated from inputs(), and it's time to
> remove sbi_putc to make the opensbi code clearer. Here are the
> statistics of the work:
>
> lib/utils/serial/uart8250.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> uart8250_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/uart8250.c- .name = "uart8250",
> lib/utils/serial/uart8250.c: .console_putc = uart8250_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/uart8250.c- .console_getc = uart8250_getc
> lib/utils/serial/uart8250.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/renesas_scif.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> renesas_scif_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/renesas_scif.c- .name = "renesas_scif",
> lib/utils/serial/renesas_scif.c: .console_putc = renesas_scif_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/renesas_scif.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> semihosting_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c- .name = "semihosting",
> lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c: .console_putc = semihosting_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c- .console_puts = semihosting_puts,
> lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c- .console_getc = semihosting_getc
> lib/utils/serial/semihosting.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/shakti-uart.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> shakti_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/shakti-uart.c- .name = "shakti_uart",
> lib/utils/serial/shakti-uart.c: .console_putc = shakti_uart_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/shakti-uart.c- .console_getc = shakti_uart_getc
> lib/utils/serial/shakti-uart.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/sifive-uart.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> sifive_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/sifive-uart.c- .name = "sifive_uart",
> lib/utils/serial/sifive-uart.c: .console_putc = sifive_uart_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/sifive-uart.c- .console_getc = sifive_uart_getc
> lib/utils/serial/sifive-uart.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/litex-uart.c-static struct sbi_console_device litex_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/litex-uart.c- .name = "litex_uart",
> lib/utils/serial/litex-uart.c: .console_putc = litex_uart_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/litex-uart.c- .console_getc = litex_uart_getc
> lib/utils/serial/litex-uart.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/gaisler-uart.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> gaisler_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/gaisler-uart.c- .name = "gaisler_uart",
> lib/utils/serial/gaisler-uart.c: .console_putc = gaisler_uart_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/gaisler-uart.c- .console_getc = gaisler_uart_getc
> lib/utils/serial/gaisler-uart.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/xlnx-uartlite.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> xlnx_uartlite_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/xlnx-uartlite.c- .name = "xlnx-uartlite",
> lib/utils/serial/xlnx-uartlite.c: .console_putc = xlnx_uartlite_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/xlnx-uartlite.c- .console_getc = xlnx_uartlite_getc
> lib/utils/serial/xlnx-uartlite.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/serial/cadence-uart.c-static struct sbi_console_device
> cadence_console = {
> lib/utils/serial/cadence-uart.c- .name = "cadence_uart",
> lib/utils/serial/cadence-uart.c: .console_putc = cadence_uart_putc,
> lib/utils/serial/cadence-uart.c- .console_getc = cadence_uart_getc
> lib/utils/serial/cadence-uart.c-};
> --
> lib/utils/sys/htif.c-static struct sbi_console_device htif_console = {
> lib/utils/sys/htif.c- .name = "htif",
> lib/utils/sys/htif.c: .console_putc = htif_putc,
> lib/utils/sys/htif.c- .console_getc = htif_getc
> lib/utils/sys/htif.c-};
>
> Is it worth removing .console_putc by implementing .console_puts.?
I think sbi_console.c can be modified to make console_putc unnecessary. Just
implement one of console_putc/console_puts. This can reduce modifications to
sbi_console_device.
Regards,
Xiang W
>
> > static int semihosting_getc(void)
> > {
> > char ch = 0;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> >
> > --
> > opensbi mailing list
> > opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Guo Ren
>
More information about the opensbi
mailing list