Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib: reset: thead: Correct the naming convention of dts

[Conor Dooley]

On 25 May 2023 04:15:36 IST, Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org> wrote:

>So it could be "thead,cpu-reset", okay?

As a generic fallback compatible.

>Actually, our core could let SoC vendors define their own custom
>CSRs/custom reset values of CSRs, so we don't know what would be added
>in the future. Put a array in dts instead of hard-code table is much
>more flexiblity.

If there's going to be 700 different variations depending on what people do with openc910, then allowing it to be passed sounds like a good idea.

Thanks,
Conor.