[PATCH 1/9] include: sbi: Fine grain the permissions for M and SU modes
Anup Patel
anup at brainfault.org
Fri Jan 6 09:35:53 PST 2023
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 4:16 PM Himanshu Chauhan
<hchauhan at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Split the permissions for M-mode and SU-mode. This would
> help if different sections of OpenSBI need to be given
> different permissions and if M-mode has different permisssions
> than the SU-mode over a region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Chauhan <hchauhan at ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> include/sbi/sbi_domain.h | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sbi/sbi_domain.h b/include/sbi/sbi_domain.h
> index 5553d21..955ffa3 100644
> --- a/include/sbi/sbi_domain.h
> +++ b/include/sbi/sbi_domain.h
> @@ -36,11 +36,41 @@ struct sbi_domain_memregion {
> */
> unsigned long base;
> /** Flags representing memory region attributes */
> -#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_READABLE (1UL << 0)
> -#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_WRITEABLE (1UL << 1)
> -#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_EXECUTABLE (1UL << 2)
> -#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_MMODE (1UL << 3)
> -#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_ACCESS_MASK (0xfUL)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_READABLE (1UL << 0)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_WRITABLE (1UL << 1)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_EXECUTABLE (1UL << 2)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_READABLE (1UL << 3)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_WRITABLE (1UL << 4)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_EXECUTABLE (1UL << 5)
> +
> + /** Bit to control if permissions are enforced on all modes */
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_ENF_PERMISSIONS (1UL << 6)
> +
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_RWX (SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_READABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_WRITABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_EXECUTABLE)
> +
> + /* Unrestricted M-mode accesses but enfoced on SU-mode */
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_READABLE (SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_READABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_RWX)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_WRITEABLE (SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_WRITABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_RWX)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_EXECUTABLE (SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_EXECUTABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_RWX)
> +
> + /* Enforced accesses across all modes */
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_ENF_READABLE (SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_READABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_READABLE)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_ENF_WRITABLE (SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_WRITABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_WRITABLE)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_ENF_EXECUTABLE (SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_EXECUTABLE | \
> + SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_EXECUTABLE)
Small nit: Please try to keep each line within 80 characters
> +
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_ACCESS_MASK (0x3fUL)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_M_ACCESS_MASK (0x7UL)
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_ACCESS_MASK (0x38UL)
> +
> +#define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_SU_ACCESS_SHIFT (3)
>
> #define SBI_DOMAIN_MEMREGION_MMIO (1UL << 31)
> unsigned long flags;
> --
> 2.39.0
>
>
> --
> opensbi mailing list
> opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
Otherwise, it looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>
Regards,
Anup
More information about the opensbi
mailing list