[PATCH v7 1/4] lib: sbi: Allow platform to influence cold boot HART selection
Anup Patel
apatel at ventanamicro.com
Wed Apr 5 03:11:10 PDT 2023
Resending ...
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 10:50 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27 at jrtc27.com> wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 2023, at 10:31, Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 8:27 AM Wei Liang Lim
> > <weiliang.lim at starfivetech.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com>
> >>
> >> We add an optional cold_boot_allowed() platform callback which allows
> >> platform support to decide which HARTs can do cold boot initialization.
> >>
> >> If this platform callback is not available then any HART can do cold
> >> boot initialization.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com>
> >
> > Applied this patch to the riscv/opensbi repo
>
> So, no attempt to engage with my objections to the concept as a whole
> in past patches? Instead you just steamrolled it through over the
> holiday period. I didn’t even notice this had been re-posted until now.
I did wait 9 days for any comments and since there were no comments
I assumed there are no objections.
Overall from OpenSBI perspective, it is good to allow platforms to
select HARTs which can do the cold boot sequence.
Regards,
Anup
>
> Jess
>
> > Thanks,
> > Anup
> >
> >> ---
> >> include/sbi/sbi_platform.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> lib/sbi/sbi_init.c | 7 +++++--
> >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/sbi/sbi_platform.h b/include/sbi/sbi_platform.h
> >> index 722f27a..bd0d5ca 100644
> >> --- a/include/sbi/sbi_platform.h
> >> +++ b/include/sbi/sbi_platform.h
> >> @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ enum sbi_platform_features {
> >>
> >> /** Platform functions */
> >> struct sbi_platform_operations {
> >> + /* Check if specified HART is allowed to do cold boot */
> >> + bool (*cold_boot_allowed)(u32 hartid);
> >> +
> >> /* Platform nascent initialization */
> >> int (*nascent_init)(void);
> >>
> >> @@ -356,6 +359,23 @@ static inline bool sbi_platform_hart_invalid(const struct sbi_platform *plat,
> >> return FALSE;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * Check whether given HART is allowed to do cold boot
> >> + *
> >> + * @param plat pointer to struct sbi_platform
> >> + * @param hartid HART ID
> >> + *
> >> + * @return true if HART is allowed to do cold boot and false otherwise
> >> + */
> >> +static inline bool sbi_platform_cold_boot_allowed(
> >> + const struct sbi_platform *plat,
> >> + u32 hartid)
> >> +{
> >> + if (plat && sbi_platform_ops(plat)->cold_boot_allowed)
> >> + return sbi_platform_ops(plat)->cold_boot_allowed(hartid);
> >> + return true;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /**
> >> * Nascent (very early) initialization for current HART
> >> *
> >> diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_init.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_init.c
> >> index a8500e5..d45cee6 100644
> >> --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_init.c
> >> +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_init.c
> >> @@ -498,8 +498,11 @@ void __noreturn sbi_init(struct sbi_scratch *scratch)
> >> * HARTs which satisfy above condition.
> >> */
> >>
> >> - if (next_mode_supported && atomic_xchg(&coldboot_lottery, 1) == 0)
> >> - coldboot = TRUE;
> >> + if (sbi_platform_cold_boot_allowed(plat, hartid)) {
> >> + if (next_mode_supported &&
> >> + atomic_xchg(&coldboot_lottery, 1) == 0)
> >> + coldboot = true;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Do platform specific nascent (very early) initialization so
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> opensbi mailing list
> >> opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
> >
> > --
> > opensbi mailing list
> > opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
>
More information about the opensbi
mailing list