[PATCH 1/2] lib: utils/ipi: Fix size check in aclint_mswi_cold_init()
Dong Du
dd_nirvana at sjtu.edu.cn
Sat Jan 8 00:34:10 PST 2022
On Jan 8, 2022, at 12:03 PM, Anup Patel apatel at ventanamicro.com wrote:
> Currently, the ACLINT MSWI size check is forcing size to be at least
> 0x4000. This is inappropriate check because most systems will never
> utilize full 16KB for a single ACLINT MSWI device so instead we should
> check that ACLINT MSWI size is enough for on the associated HARTs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> lib/utils/ipi/aclint_mswi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/utils/ipi/aclint_mswi.c b/lib/utils/ipi/aclint_mswi.c
> index a3de2f5..832e223 100644
> --- a/lib/utils/ipi/aclint_mswi.c
> +++ b/lib/utils/ipi/aclint_mswi.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int aclint_mswi_cold_init(struct aclint_mswi_data *mswi)
>
> /* Sanity checks */
> if (!mswi || (mswi->addr & (ACLINT_MSWI_ALIGN - 1)) ||
> - (mswi->size < ACLINT_MSWI_SIZE) ||
> + (mswi->size < (mswi->hart_count * sizeof(u32))) ||
Hi Anup,
Shouldn't we also change ACLINT_MSWI_SIZE in lib/utils/ipi/fdt_ipi_mswi.c?
Regards,
Dong
> (mswi->first_hartid >= SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS) ||
> (mswi->hart_count > ACLINT_MSWI_MAX_HARTS))
> return SBI_EINVAL;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> --
> opensbi mailing list
> opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
More information about the opensbi
mailing list