[PATCH] lib: sbi: Checking fifo validness in sbi_fifo_is_empty and is_full

Anup Patel anup at brainfault.org
Thu Sep 2 23:34:48 PDT 2021


On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 2:52 AM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:47 AM Dong Du <Dd_nirvana at sjtu.edu.cn> wrote:
> >
> > As other exported fifo functions, we should check whether the fifo is
> > valid in sbi_fifo_is_empty and sbi_fifo_is_full.
> > To this end, this patch changes the retval from bool to int, and the
> > two functions will return SBI_EINVAL in the case the fifo is invalid.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Du <Dd_nirvana at sjtu.edu.cn>
> > ---
> >  include/sbi/sbi_fifo.h |  4 ++--
> >  lib/sbi/sbi_fifo.c     | 10 ++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/sbi/sbi_fifo.h b/include/sbi/sbi_fifo.h
> > index bc8f8f6..1a85f07 100644
> > --- a/include/sbi/sbi_fifo.h
> > +++ b/include/sbi/sbi_fifo.h
> > @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ int sbi_fifo_dequeue(struct sbi_fifo *fifo, void *data);
> >  int sbi_fifo_enqueue(struct sbi_fifo *fifo, void *data);
> >  void sbi_fifo_init(struct sbi_fifo *fifo, void *queue_mem, u16 entries,
> >                    u16 entry_size);
> > -bool sbi_fifo_is_empty(struct sbi_fifo *fifo);
> > -bool sbi_fifo_is_full(struct sbi_fifo *fifo);
> > +int sbi_fifo_is_empty(struct sbi_fifo *fifo);
> > +int sbi_fifo_is_full(struct sbi_fifo *fifo);
> >  int sbi_fifo_inplace_update(struct sbi_fifo *fifo, void *in,
> >                             int (*fptr)(void *in, void *data));
> >  u16 sbi_fifo_avail(struct sbi_fifo *fifo);
> > diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_fifo.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_fifo.c
> > index b2395f3..589cc18 100644
> > --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_fifo.c
> > +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_fifo.c
> > @@ -43,10 +43,13 @@ u16 sbi_fifo_avail(struct sbi_fifo *fifo)
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -bool sbi_fifo_is_full(struct sbi_fifo *fifo)
> > +int sbi_fifo_is_full(struct sbi_fifo *fifo)
> >  {
> >         bool ret;
> >
> > +       if (!fifo)
> > +               return SBI_EINVAL;
> > +
> >         spin_lock(&fifo->qlock);
> >         ret = __sbi_fifo_is_full(fifo);
> >         spin_unlock(&fifo->qlock);
> > @@ -75,10 +78,13 @@ static inline bool __sbi_fifo_is_empty(struct sbi_fifo *fifo)
> >         return (fifo->avail == 0) ? TRUE : FALSE;
> >  }
> >
> > -bool sbi_fifo_is_empty(struct sbi_fifo *fifo)
> > +int sbi_fifo_is_empty(struct sbi_fifo *fifo)
> >  {
> >         bool ret;
> >
> > +       if (!fifo)
> > +               return SBI_EINVAL;
> > +
> >         spin_lock(&fifo->qlock);
> >         ret = __sbi_fifo_is_empty(fifo);
> >         spin_unlock(&fifo->qlock);
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
> >
> > --
> > opensbi mailing list
> > opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>

Applied this patch to the riscv/opensbi repo.

Thanks,
Anup

>
> --
> Regards,
> Atish
>
> --
> opensbi mailing list
> opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi



More information about the opensbi mailing list