[PATCH v1 1/1] lib: sbi: Have spinlock checks return bool

[Daniel Schaefer]

spin_lock_check already returned bool in the source file but not in the
header. With some toolchains that causes an error, as it should.

Because it and related functions all essentially return a bool, we can
use this opportunity to change them.

Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang at hpe.com>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schaefer <git at danielschaefer.me>
---
 include/sbi/riscv_locks.h | 4 ++--
 lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c     | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sbi/riscv_locks.h b/include/sbi/riscv_locks.h
index 492935f5d60b..38d9cbeb7b2a 100644
--- a/include/sbi/riscv_locks.h
+++ b/include/sbi/riscv_locks.h
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ typedef struct {
 #define DEFINE_SPIN_LOCK(x)	\
 	spinlock_t SPIN_LOCK_INIT(x)
 
-int spin_lock_check(spinlock_t *lock);
+bool spin_lock_check(spinlock_t *lock);
 
-int spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock);
+bool spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock);
 
 void spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock);
 
diff --git a/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c b/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c
index 75b443bd35b8..acab7769240b 100644
--- a/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c
+++ b/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 #include <sbi/riscv_barrier.h>
 #include <sbi/riscv_locks.h>
 
-static inline int spin_lock_unlocked(spinlock_t lock)
+static inline bool spin_lock_unlocked(spinlock_t lock)
 {
 	return lock.owner == lock.next;
 }
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ bool spin_lock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
 	return !spin_lock_unlocked(*lock);
 }
 
-int spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock)
+bool spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock)
 {
 	unsigned long inc = 1u << TICKET_SHIFT;
 	unsigned long mask = 0xffffu << TICKET_SHIFT;
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock)
 		: "r"(inc), "r"(mask), "I"(TICKET_SHIFT)
 		: "memory");
 
-	return !l0;
+	return l0 == 0;
 }
 
 void spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
-- 
2.30.1