[PATCH] Makefile: Don't specify mabi or march
Jessica Clarke
jrtc27 at jrtc27.com
Mon Oct 19 18:56:35 EDT 2020
On 19 Oct 2020, at 23:41, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at wdc.com> wrote:
>
> To avoid
> can't link double-float modules with soft-float modules
> errors when building 32-bit openSBI don't specify mabi or march.
What happens if you want to build for a different ABI or ISA string
deliberately? Especially with something like Clang where every compiler
is a cross-compiler. Users should be able to specify an ABI or ISA
string if they want and have it honoured, either via
PLATFORM_RISCV_ABI/ISA or by using += for CFLAGS everywhere rather than
overwriting it entirely (which is the more standard thing to do for
software that isn't RISC-V-specific).
Jess
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at wdc.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index a231881..3f819d9 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ GENFLAGS += $(firmware-genflags-y)
> CFLAGS = -g -Wall -Werror -ffreestanding -nostdlib -fno-strict-aliasing -O2
> CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> CFLAGS += -mno-save-restore -mstrict-align
> -CFLAGS += -mabi=$(PLATFORM_RISCV_ABI) -march=$(PLATFORM_RISCV_ISA)
> CFLAGS += -mcmodel=$(PLATFORM_RISCV_CODE_MODEL)
> CFLAGS += $(GENFLAGS)
> CFLAGS += $(platform-cflags-y)
> @@ -210,7 +209,6 @@ CPPFLAGS += $(firmware-cppflags-y)
> ASFLAGS = -g -Wall -nostdlib -D__ASSEMBLY__
> ASFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> ASFLAGS += -mno-save-restore -mstrict-align
> -ASFLAGS += -mabi=$(PLATFORM_RISCV_ABI) -march=$(PLATFORM_RISCV_ISA)
> ASFLAGS += -mcmodel=$(PLATFORM_RISCV_CODE_MODEL)
> ASFLAGS += $(GENFLAGS)
> ASFLAGS += $(platform-asflags-y)
> --
> 2.28.0
>
>
> --
> opensbi mailing list
> opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
More information about the opensbi
mailing list