[PATCH 08/16] lib: sbi: Extend sbi_hsm_hart_start() for domains

Atish Patra atishp at atishpatra.org
Sun Oct 18 19:54:31 EDT 2020


On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:05 AM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:27 AM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:30 AM Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The sbi_hsm_hart_start() should consider the domain under which we
> > > are trying to start the HART. This will help ensure that HART A can
> > > start HART B only if both HARTs A and B belong to the same domain.
> > >
> > > We also have a special case when we bring-up boot HART of non-root
> > > domains in sbi_domain_finalize() where we should skip domain checks
> > > in sbi_hsm_hart_start(). To achieve this, sbi_hsm_hart_start() should
> > > do domain checks only when domain parameter is non-NULL.
> > >
> > > This patch extends sbi_hsm_hart_start() as-per above.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/sbi/sbi_hsm.h   |  5 +++--
> > >  lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c    |  6 ++++--
> > >  lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_hsm.c |  4 ++--
> > >  lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c       | 16 ++++++++--------
> > >  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/sbi/sbi_hsm.h b/include/sbi/sbi_hsm.h
> > > index 296b267..4823383 100644
> > > --- a/include/sbi/sbi_hsm.h
> > > +++ b/include/sbi/sbi_hsm.h
> > > @@ -25,8 +25,9 @@ struct sbi_scratch;
> > >  int sbi_hsm_init(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 hartid, bool cold_boot);
> > >  void __noreturn sbi_hsm_exit(struct sbi_scratch *scratch);
> > >
> > > -int sbi_hsm_hart_start(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 hartid,
> > > -                      ulong saddr, ulong smode, ulong priv);
> > > +int sbi_hsm_hart_start(struct sbi_scratch *scratch,
> > > +                      const struct sbi_domain *dom,
> > > +                      u32 hartid, ulong saddr, ulong smode, ulong priv);
> > >  int sbi_hsm_hart_stop(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, bool exitnow);
> > >  int sbi_hsm_hart_get_state(const struct sbi_domain *dom, u32 hartid);
> > >  int sbi_hsm_hart_state_to_status(int state);
> > > diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c
> > > index 8d5dae1..df0f2a5 100644
> > > --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c
> > > +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_domain.c
> > > @@ -309,8 +309,10 @@ int sbi_domain_finalize(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 cold_hartid)
> > >                         scratch->next_mode = dom->next_mode;
> > >                         scratch->next_arg1 = dom->next_arg1;
> > >                 } else {
> > > -                       rc = sbi_hsm_hart_start(scratch, dhart, dom->next_addr,
> > > -                                       dom->next_mode, dom->next_arg1);
> > > +                       rc = sbi_hsm_hart_start(scratch, NULL, dhart,
> > > +                                               dom->next_addr,
> > > +                                               dom->next_mode,
> > > +                                               dom->next_arg1);
> > >                         if (rc)
> > >                                 return rc;
> > >                 }
> > > diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_hsm.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_hsm.c
> > > index 3698a41..376740c 100644
> > > --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_hsm.c
> > > +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_hsm.c
> > > @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ static int sbi_ecall_hsm_handler(unsigned long extid, unsigned long funcid,
> > >         case SBI_EXT_HSM_HART_START:
> > >                 smode = csr_read(CSR_MSTATUS);
> > >                 smode = (smode & MSTATUS_MPP) >> MSTATUS_MPP_SHIFT;
> > > -               ret = sbi_hsm_hart_start(scratch, args[0], args[1],
> > > -                                        smode, args[2]);
> > > +               ret = sbi_hsm_hart_start(scratch, sbi_domain_thishart_ptr(),
> > > +                                        args[0], args[1], smode, args[2]);
> > >                 break;
> > >         case SBI_EXT_HSM_HART_STOP:
> > >                 ret = sbi_hsm_hart_stop(scratch, TRUE);
> > > diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
> > > index 1f8dadc..c16d542 100644
> > > --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
> > > +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
> > > @@ -205,10 +205,10 @@ fail_exit:
> > >         sbi_hart_hang();
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -int sbi_hsm_hart_start(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 hartid,
> > > -                      ulong saddr, ulong smode, ulong priv)
> > > +int sbi_hsm_hart_start(struct sbi_scratch *scratch,
> > > +                      const struct sbi_domain *dom,
> > > +                      u32 hartid, ulong saddr, ulong smode, ulong priv)
> > >  {
> > > -       int rc;
> > >         unsigned long init_count;
> > >         unsigned int hstate;
> > >         struct sbi_scratch *rscratch;
> > > @@ -217,6 +217,11 @@ int sbi_hsm_hart_start(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 hartid,
> > >
> > >         if (smode != PRV_M && smode != PRV_S && smode != PRV_U)
> > >                 return SBI_EINVAL;
> > > +       if (dom && !sbi_domain_assigned_hart(dom, hartid))
> > > +               return SBI_EINVAL;
> > > +       if (dom && !sbi_domain_check_addr(dom, saddr, smode,
> > > +                                         FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, TRUE))
> > > +               return SBI_EINVAL;
> > >
> > >         rscratch = sbi_hartid_to_scratch(hartid);
> > >         if (!rscratch)
> > > @@ -234,11 +239,6 @@ int sbi_hsm_hart_start(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, u32 hartid,
> > >         if (hstate != SBI_HART_STOPPED)
> > >                 return SBI_EINVAL;
> > >
> > > -       rc = sbi_hart_pmp_check_addr(scratch, saddr, smode, PMP_X);
> > > -       if (rc)
> > > -               return rc;
> > > -       //TODO: We also need to check saddr for valid physical address as well.
> > > -
> >
> > Why is the check being removed ? IIRC, this API was improved in your
> > last series to include the mode but removed completely later in this
> > series.
> > Maybe I missed something in the series or yet to review.
>
> The sbi_hart_pmp_check_addr() call is redundant here because the
> sbi_domain_check_addr() above does the required checks.
>

Yes. I know. I was asking sbi_hart_pmp_check_addr improved in domain
preparation series
but removed in actual domain series. That's why, I was asking why it
was improved last time
if it was to be removed in the next series. I guess you changed your
implementation approach in between :).

> >
> > >         init_count = sbi_init_count(hartid);
> > >         rscratch->next_arg1 = priv;
> > >         rscratch->next_addr = saddr;
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > opensbi mailing list
> > > opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Atish
>
> Regards,
> Anup



-- 
Regards,
Atish



More information about the opensbi mailing list