[PATCH] lib: sbi_misaligned_ldst: Determine transformed instruction length correctly

Atish Patra atishp at atishpatra.org
Thu Jul 30 02:42:39 EDT 2020


On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:02 AM Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com> wrote:
>
> If MTINST[0:0] bit is 1 then we have transformed instruction encoding
> in MTINST CSR. For transformed instructions, if the MTINST[1:1] bit
> is Zero then original trapped instruction was a 16bit instruction
> which was converted to 32bit instruction at time of taking trap.
>
> We should use MTINST[1:1] bit to determine correct instruction length
> of transformed instruction.
>
> This patch updates misaligned load/store emulation as-per above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com>
> ---
>  lib/sbi/sbi_misaligned_ldst.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_misaligned_ldst.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_misaligned_ldst.c
> index 29d79bb..964a372 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_misaligned_ldst.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_misaligned_ldst.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ union reg_data {
>  int sbi_misaligned_load_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                                 struct sbi_trap_regs *regs)
>  {
> -       ulong insn;
> +       ulong insn, insn_len;
>         union reg_data val;
>         struct sbi_trap_info uptrap;
>         int i, fp = 0, shift = 0, len = 0;
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ int sbi_misaligned_load_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                  * transformed instruction or custom instruction.
>                  */
>                 insn = tinst | INSN_16BIT_MASK;
> +               insn_len = (tinst & 0x2) ? INSN_LEN(insn) : 2;
>         } else {
>                 /*
>                  * Bit[0] == 0 implies trapped instruction value is
> @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ int sbi_misaligned_load_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                         uptrap.epc = regs->mepc;
>                         return sbi_trap_redirect(regs, &uptrap);
>                 }
> +               insn_len = INSN_LEN(insn);
>         }
>
>         if ((insn & INSN_MASK_LW) == INSN_MATCH_LW) {
> @@ -134,7 +136,7 @@ int sbi_misaligned_load_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                 SET_F32_RD(insn, regs, val.data_ulong);
>  #endif
>
> -       regs->mepc += INSN_LEN(insn);
> +       regs->mepc += insn_len;
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -142,7 +144,7 @@ int sbi_misaligned_load_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>  int sbi_misaligned_store_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                                  struct sbi_trap_regs *regs)
>  {
> -       ulong insn;
> +       ulong insn, insn_len;
>         union reg_data val;
>         struct sbi_trap_info uptrap;
>         int i, len = 0;
> @@ -153,6 +155,7 @@ int sbi_misaligned_store_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                  * transformed instruction or custom instruction.
>                  */
>                 insn = tinst | INSN_16BIT_MASK;
> +               insn_len = (tinst & 0x2) ? INSN_LEN(insn) : 2;
>         } else {
>                 /*
>                  * Bit[0] == 0 implies trapped instruction value is
> @@ -163,6 +166,7 @@ int sbi_misaligned_store_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                         uptrap.epc = regs->mepc;
>                         return sbi_trap_redirect(regs, &uptrap);
>                 }
> +               insn_len = INSN_LEN(insn);
>         }
>
>         val.data_ulong = GET_RS2(insn, regs);
> @@ -233,7 +237,7 @@ int sbi_misaligned_store_handler(ulong addr, ulong tval2, ulong tinst,
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       regs->mepc += INSN_LEN(insn);
> +       regs->mepc += insn_len;
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>

>
> --
> opensbi mailing list
> opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi



-- 
Regards,
Atish



More information about the opensbi mailing list