[PATCH 2/2] testing/radix-tree/maple: Hack around kfree_rcu not existing

[Liam R. Howlett]

* Pedro Falcato <pfalcato at suse.de> [250718 13:21]:
> liburcu doesn't have kfree_rcu (or anything similar). Despite that, we
> can hack around it in a trivial fashion, by adding a wrapper.
> 
> This wrapper only works for maple_nodes, and not anything else (due to
> us not being able to know rcu_head offsets in any way), and thus we take
> advantage of the type checking to avoid future silent breakage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato at suse.de>

Thanks, but shouldn't this be patch 1 so that the testing continues to
work?

> ---
>  tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> index 172700fb7784..bfdc93c36cf9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,23 @@
>  #define MODULE_LICENSE(x)
>  #define dump_stack()	assert(0)
>  
> +
> +#include <linux/maple_tree.h>
> +
> +static void free_node(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> +	struct maple_node *node = container_of(head, struct maple_node, rcu);
> +
> +	free(node);
> +}
> +
> +static void kfree_rcu_node(struct maple_node *node)
> +{
> +	call_rcu(&node->rcu, free_node);
> +}
> +
> +#define kfree_rcu(ptr, memb) kfree_rcu_node(ptr)
> +
>  #include "../../../lib/maple_tree.c"
>  #include "../../../lib/test_maple_tree.c"
>  
> -- 
> 2.50.1
>