[PATCH v3 3/5] maple_tree: not necessary to check index/last again
Wei Yang
richard.weiyang at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 17:28:41 PDT 2024
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 01:43:18PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang at gmail.com> [241017 22:40]:
>> Before calling mas_new_root(), the range has been checked.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang at gmail.com>
>> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett at Oracle.com>
>> CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar at oracle.com>
>> CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes at oracle.com>
>> ---
>> lib/maple_tree.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
>> index cbbaaf60efa9..db8b89487c98 100644
>> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
>> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
>> @@ -3662,7 +3662,7 @@ static inline void mas_new_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
>> void __rcu **slots;
>> unsigned long *pivots;
>>
>> - if (!entry && !mas->index && mas->last == ULONG_MAX) {
>> + if (!entry) {
>
>Probably good to catch anyone using this wrong with a WARN_ON_ONCE()?
>It also has the effect of documenting what is going on, which is always
>nice.
>
Sure, will add a WARN_ON_ONCE().
>Sorry for not realising this earlier.
>
>> mas->depth = 0;
>> mas_set_height(mas);
>> rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, entry);
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
More information about the maple-tree
mailing list