[PATCH v4 64/66] nommu: Remove uses of VMA linked list

Matthew Wilcox willy at infradead.org
Thu Jan 20 07:54:14 PST 2022


On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 04:06:21PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/1/21 15:30, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy at infradead.org>
> > 
> > Use the maple tree or VMA iterator instead.  This is faster and will
> > allow us to shrink the VMA.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy at infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett at Oracle.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka at suse.cz>
> 
> But I think some fixup needed:
> 
> > @@ -1456,12 +1458,14 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  
> >  	mm->total_vm = 0;
> >  
> > -	while ((vma = mm->mmap)) {
> > -		mm->mmap = vma->vm_next;
> > +	mmap_write_lock(mm);
> 
> If locking was missing, should have been added sooner than now?

I don't think so?  This is the exit_mmap() path, so we know nobody
has access to the mm.  We didn't need to hold the lock at this point
before, but now for_each_vma() will check we're holding the mmap_lock.

> > +	for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
> >  		delete_vma_from_mm(vma);
> >  		delete_vma(mm, vma);
> >  		cond_resched();
> >  	}
> > +	__mt_destroy(&mm->mm_mt);
> 
> And this at the point mm_mt was added?

You mean we should have been calling __mt_destroy() earlier in the
patch series?  Umm ... I'll defer to Liam on that one.



More information about the maple-tree mailing list