[PATCH v4 33/66] xtensa: Remove vma linked list walks

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 12/1/21 15:30, Liam Howlett wrote:
> From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett at Oracle.com>
> 
> Use the VMA iterator instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy at infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett at Oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/xtensa/kernel/syscall.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/syscall.c
> index 201356faa7e6..20ec9534e01f 100644
> --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ unsigned long arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
>  		unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
>  {
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vmm;
> +	VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, mm, addr)

Need to use current->mm or it won't compile, AFAICS.

;
>  
>  	if (flags & MAP_FIXED) {
>  		/* We do not accept a shared mapping if it would violate
> @@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ unsigned long arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
>  	else
>  		addr = PAGE_ALIGN(addr);
>  
> -	for (vmm = find_vma(current->mm, addr); ; vmm = vmm->vm_next) {
> +	for_each_vma(vmi, vmm) {
>  		/* At this point:  (!vmm || addr < vmm->vm_end). */

Well if at this point !vmm then we are no longer here due to for_each_vma().

>  		if (TASK_SIZE - len < addr)
>  			return -ENOMEM;

Thus we can miss this? But maybe it could be moved above the for loop and
checked just once, as addr only grows inside the for loop?

However, the loop body continues:

>                 if (!vmm || addr + len <= vm_start_gap(vmm))
>                         return addr;

So after your patch we fail to return the unmapped area after the last vma.