[PATCH 2/7] printk: Use consoles_suspended flag when suspending/resuming all consoles

[John Ogness]

On 2025-06-24, Petr Mladek <pmladek at suse.com> wrote:
>> > Variant C:
>> > ==========
>> >
>> > Remove even @flags parameter from console_is_usable() and read both
>> > values there directly.
>> >
>> > Many callers read @flags only because they call console_is_usable().
>> > The change would simplify the code.
>> >
>> > But there are few exceptions:
>> >
>> >    2. Another exception is __pr_flush() where console_is_usable() is
>> >       called twice with @use_atomic set "true" and "false".
>> >
>> >       We would want to read "con->flags" only once here. A solution
>> >       would be to add a parameter to check both con->write_atomic
>> >       and con->write_thread in a single call.
>> 
>> Or it could become a bitmask of printing types to check:
>> 
>> #define ATOMIC_PRINTING 0x1
>> #define NONATOMIC_PRINTING 0x2
>> 
>> and then __pr_flush() looks like:
>> 
>> if (!console_is_usable(c, flags, ATOMIC_PRINTING|NONATOMIC_PRINTING)
>
> I like this. It will help even in all other cases when one mode is needed.
> I mean that, for example:
>
>    console_is_usable(c, flags, ATOMIC_PRINTING)
>
> is more self-explaining than
>
>    console_is_usable(c, flags, true)

After I wrote that suggestion, I decided that the naming is not
good. There is always confusion about what "atomic printing" means. For
that reason the parameter was changed to "use_atomic". Basically we are
specifying which callback to use and not the purpose. It is a bit tricky
because legacy consoles do not have an atomic callback, i.e. the
parameter only has meaning for nbcon consoles.

Perhaps these macros would be more suitable:

#define NBCON_USE_ATOMIC 0x1
#define NBCON_USE_THREAD 0x2

or

#define NBCON_USE_WRITE_ATOMIC 0x1
#define NBCON_USE_WRITE_THREAD 0x2

or

#define NBCON_ATOMIC_CB 0x1
#define NBCON_THREAD_CB 0x2

or

#define NBCON_ATOMIC_FUNC 0x1
#define NBCON_THREAD_FUNC 0x2

Hopefully that gives Petr enough ideas that he can come up with good
naming. ;-)

John