[PATCH v1] um: fix incompatible argument type in iounmap()
FUJITA Tomonori
fujita.tomonori at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 05:56:50 PDT 2025
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 19:30:19 +0200
Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:48, Miguel Ojeda
>> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori
>> > <fujita.tomonori at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Align iounmap() signature with other architectures.
>> >
>> > Most indeed have `volatile`, but nios2 and m68k don't -- Cc'ing them
>> > just in case.
>>
>> Indeed. Apparently the volatile keyword has not always been there...
>> Why does iounmap() need the volatile keyword?
>> Why does pci_iounmap() not have the volatile keyword?
>
> I think none of the functions within rust/helpers/io.c need volatile, since they
> just defer to the corresponding C function / macro.
Yeah, all volatile in the file should be safe to remove. I'll go with
that approach for the next version.
I think it would be nice to have the same function signature across
all architectures, but that's a separate topic.
Thanks,
More information about the linux-um
mailing list