[PATCH 1/2] um: do not send SIGALRM to userspace in time-travel mode

Benjamin Berg benjamin at sipsolutions.net
Tue Apr 8 00:45:23 PDT 2025


From: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg at intel.com>

We send a SIGALRM to userspace processes to interrupt them. Really,
doing so is only needed if they are actually executing at the time (to
ensure we return to kernelspace). Unfortunately, we do not have that
information readily available. We can however be sure that this is never
the case when we are in time-travel mode with infinite CPU.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg at intel.com>
---
 arch/um/kernel/time.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/time.c b/arch/um/kernel/time.c
index 1394568c0210..ae0fa2173778 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/time.c
@@ -856,11 +856,16 @@ static struct clock_event_device timer_clockevent = {
 
 static irqreturn_t um_timer(int irq, void *dev)
 {
-	if (get_current()->mm != NULL)
-	{
-        /* userspace - relay signal, results in correct userspace timers */
+	/*
+	 * Interrupt the (possibly) running userspace process, technically this
+	 * should only happen if userspace is currently executing.
+	 * With infinite CPU time-travel, we can only get here when userspace
+	 * is not executing. Do not notify there and avoid spurious scheduling.
+	 */
+	if (time_travel_mode != TT_MODE_INFCPU &&
+	    time_travel_mode != TT_MODE_EXTERNAL &&
+	    get_current()->mm)
 		os_alarm_process(get_current()->mm->context.id.pid);
-	}
 
 	(*timer_clockevent.event_handler)(&timer_clockevent);
 
-- 
2.49.0




More information about the linux-um mailing list