[RFC PATCH 8/9] um: Implement kernel side of SECCOMP based process handling

[Johannes Berg]

On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 13:04 +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > >  
> > > +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> > 
> > Hmm. If this works, why do we have UML_CONFIG_64BIT? For ASM stuff?
> 
> So, I just had a quick look. It seems that before commit a95b37e20db9
> ("kbuild: get <linux/compiler_types.h> out of <linux/kconfig.h>") doing
> this would have caused compilation errors.

And that commit was pretty much done for the exact same reason!

> With that change, there shouldn't be a reason for the various
> UML_CONFIG_* macros anymore. It should be safe to include
> linux/kconfig.h (and if we are not allowed to do that, we could still
> use generated/autoconf.h).
> 
> Maybe we should see this as a cleanup opportunity?

Sounds good to me! That also gives us IS_ENABLED() which can be a nice
cleanup opportunity too :-)

johannes