[PATCH v4 5/7] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Fri Feb 23 02:23:45 PST 2024
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:03:17PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 05:05:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB
> > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB.
> > When ACPI is in use, unflatten_device_tree() ignores the
> > 'initial_boot_params' pointer so the live DT on those systems won't be
> > whatever that's pointing to. Similarly, when kexec copies the DT data
> > the previous kernel to the new one on ACPI systems,
> > of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() will ignore the live DT (the empty root
> > one) and copy the 'initial_boot_params' data.
> >
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Catalin, Will, Can I get an ack on this so I can take the series via the
> DT tree.
Mark had strong pretty strong objections to this in version one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZaZtbU9hre3YhZam@FVFF77S0Q05N/
and this patch looks the same now as it did then. Did something else
change?
Will
More information about the linux-um
mailing list