[PATCH v3 7/7] of: Add KUnit test to confirm DTB is loaded

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:19 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting David Gow (2024-02-02 20:10:17)
> > On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 at 03:59, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > Add a KUnit test that confirms a DTB has been loaded, i.e. there is a
> > > root node, and that the of_have_populated_dt() API works properly.
> > >
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: David Gow <davidgow at google.com>
> > > Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins at linux.dev>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > This looks pretty good to me test-wise, though it still fails on m68k.
> > (Everything else I tried it on works, though I've definitely not tried
> > _every_ architecture.)
> >
> > aarch64: PASSED
> > i386: PASSED
> > x86_64: PASSED
> > x86_64 KASAN: PASSED
> > powerpc64: PASSED
> > UML: PASSED
> > UML LLVM: PASSED
> > m68k: FAILED
> > > $ qemu-system-m68k -nodefaults -m 1024 -kernel .kunit-all-m68k/vmlinux -append 'kunit.enable=1 console=hvc0 kunit_shutdown=reboot' -no-reboot -nographic -serial stdio -machine virt
> > > [11:55:05] ===================== dtb (2 subtests) =====================
> > > [11:55:05] # dtb_root_node_found_by_path: EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/of/of_test.c:18
> > > [11:55:05] Expected np is not null, but is
> > > [11:55:05] [FAILED] dtb_root_node_found_by_path
> > > [11:55:05] # dtb_root_node_populates_of_root: EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/of/of_test.c:28
> > > [11:55:05] Expected of_root is not null, but is
> > > [11:55:05] [FAILED] dtb_root_node_populates_of_root
> > > [11:55:05]     # module: of_test
> > > [11:55:05] # dtb: pass:0 fail:2 skip:0 total:2
> > > [11:55:05] # Totals: pass:0 fail:2 skip:0 total:2
> > > [11:55:05] ======================= [FAILED] dtb =======================
>
> Ah yeah I forgot to mention that. m68k fails because it doesn't call the
> unflatten_(and_copy)?_device_tree() function, so we don't populate a
> root node on that architecture. One solution would be to make CONFIG_OF
> unavailable on m68k. Or we have to make sure DT works on any
> architecture. Rob, what do you prefer here?

I guess the latter?
Alpha, hexagon, parisc, s390, and sparc are also lacking calls
to unflatten.*device_tree().

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds