[PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:14:55)
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded
> > into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.
> 
> As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit
> if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other
> architectures.
> 
> That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real
> topic for bikeshedding is the name.
> - Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name?
> - Do we want to include the architecture in the name?
> Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?

I think I will drop this patch. I have overlays working. I hijacked
of_core_init() to load the testcase data from drivers/of/unittest-data
and made a container node for kunit overlays to apply to.