[PATCH 0/8] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data

[David Gow]

On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> This patch series adds unit tests for the clk fixed rate basic type and
> the clk registration functions that use struct clk_parent_data. To get
> there, we add support for loading a DTB into the UML kernel that's
> running the unit tests along with probing platform drivers to bind to
> device nodes specified in DT.
>
> With this series, we're able to exercise some of the code in the common
> clk framework that uses devicetree lookups to find parents and the fixed
> rate clk code that scans devicetree directly and creates clks. Please
> review.
>

Thanks Stephen -- this is really neat!

This works well here, and I love all of the tests for the
KUnit/device-tree integration as well.

I'm still looking through the details of it (alas, I've mostly lived
in x86-land, so my device-tree knowledge is, uh, spotty to say the
least), but apart from possibly renaming some things or similarly
minor tweaks, I've not got any real suggestions thus far.

I do wonder whether we'll want, on the KUnit side, to have some way of
supporting KUnit device trees on non-UML architecctures (e.g., if we
need to test something architecture-specific, or on a big-endian
platform, etc), but I think that's a question for the future, rather
than something that affects this series.

Similarly, I wonder if there's something we could do with device tree
overlays, in order to make it possible for tests to swap nodes in and
out for testing.

I don't think either of those ideas should block this from getting in though.

> I Cced everyone to all the patches so they get the full context. I'm
> hoping I can take the whole pile through the clk tree as they almost all
> depend on each other. In the future I imagine it will be easy to add
> more test nodes to the clk.dtsi file and not need to go across various
> maintainer trees like this series does.

That seems pretty sensible to me. I expect there'll be a few minor
conflicts on the KUnit side (there are a bunch of small
lib/kunit/Makefile changes in 6.3, and there's a plan to do some more
serious changes to the kunit_resource API at some point, though I have
my doubts they'll all hit in 6.4), but I doubt they'll cause too much
strife.

Cheers,
-- David

>
> Stephen Boyd (8):
>   dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding
>   of: Enable DTB loading on UML for KUnit tests
>   kunit: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs
>   clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs
>   dt-bindings: kunit: Add fixed rate clk consumer test
>   clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type
>   dt-bindings: clk: Add KUnit clk_parent_data test
>   clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data
>
>  .../clock/linux,clk-kunit-parent-data.yaml    |  47 ++
>  .../kunit/linux,clk-kunit-fixed-rate.yaml     |  35 ++
>  .../bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml           |  24 +
>  arch/um/kernel/dtb.c                          |  29 +-
>  drivers/clk/.kunitconfig                      |   3 +
>  drivers/clk/Kconfig                           |   7 +
>  drivers/clk/Makefile                          |   6 +
>  drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate_test.c             | 296 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/clk-kunit.c                       | 204 ++++++++
>  drivers/clk/clk-kunit.h                       |  28 ++
>  drivers/clk/clk_test.c                        | 456 +++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/of/Kconfig                            |  26 +
>  drivers/of/Makefile                           |   1 +
>  drivers/of/kunit/.kunitconfig                 |   4 +
>  drivers/of/kunit/Makefile                     |   4 +
>  drivers/of/kunit/clk.dtsi                     |  30 ++
>  drivers/of/kunit/kunit.dtsi                   |   9 +
>  drivers/of/kunit/kunit.dtso                   |   4 +
>  drivers/of/kunit/uml_dtb_test.c               |  55 +++
>  include/kunit/platform_driver.h               |  15 +
>  lib/kunit/Makefile                            |   6 +
>  lib/kunit/platform_driver-test.c              | 107 ++++
>  lib/kunit/platform_driver.c                   | 207 ++++++++
>  23 files changed, 1599 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/linux,clk-kunit-parent-data.yaml
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,clk-kunit-fixed-rate.yaml
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate_test.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-kunit.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-kunit.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit/.kunitconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit/clk.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit/kunit.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit/kunit.dtso
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit/uml_dtb_test.c
>  create mode 100644 include/kunit/platform_driver.h
>  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/platform_driver-test.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/platform_driver.c
>
>
> base-commit: c9c3395d5e3dcc6daee66c6908354d47bf98cb0c
> --
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4003 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-um/attachments/20230302/697967f2/attachment-0001.p7s>