[PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: Support getting current task struct in UML

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:56:43 -0600 Glenn Washburn <development at efficientek.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 11:14:01 +0100
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:33 AM Andrew Morton
> > <akpm at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:54:38 +0100 (CET) Richard Weinberger
> > > <richard at nod.at> wrote:
> > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > > > Von: "Andrew Morton" <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> > > > > Thanks, but I'm not subscribed to linux-um and my usual
> > > > > get-it-from-lkml didn't work.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could we please have a resend, with a cc to linux-kernel?
> > > >
> > > > You can also get the patches in mbox format from:
> > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-um/list/?series=342212
> > 
> > And from there, you can get the Message-IDs, and use lore:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/683d10e752cd4852ac62ef3cc3e9a6972a017bdf.1676532759.git.development@efficientek.com
> > or b4:
> > b4 mbox
> > 683d10e752cd4852ac62ef3cc3e9a6972a017bdf.1676532759.git.development at efficientek.com
> > b4 am
> > 683d10e752cd4852ac62ef3cc3e9a6972a017bdf.1676532759.git.development at efficientek.com
> > 
> > > Thanks, but..
> > >
> > > - Can't do reply-to-all if I have comments
> > > - Can't collect people's followup acks and review comments
> > > - No Link tag
> 
> Ok, so do I need to resend after all?

Yes please.  Call it v2, add any acks and reviewed-bys.

> And anther point in need of
> clarification, regardless of subsystem or area of source, when sending
> patches, should I always cc to linux-kernel?

I think it's best.  That's pretty much the only purpose lkml serves now :(