mmotm 2022-03-16-17-42 uploaded (uml sub-x86_64, sched/fair, RCU)
Randy Dunlap
rdunlap at infradead.org
Thu Mar 17 17:10:29 PDT 2022
On 3/17/22 16:51, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:52:44 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> wrote:
>
>>>> In file included from ./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/rwonce.h:1:0,
>>>> from ../include/linux/compiler.h:248,
>>>> from ../include/linux/kernel.h:20,
>>>> from ../include/linux/cpumask.h:10,
>>>> from ../include/linux/energy_model.h:4,
>>>> from ../kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
>>>> ../include/linux/psi.h: In function ‘cgroup_move_task’:
>>>> ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:414:36: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct css_set’
>>>> #define RCU_INITIALIZER(v) (typeof(*(v)) __force __rcu *)(v)
>>>> ^~~~
>>>
>>> Works For Me. I tried `make x86_64_defconfig' and `make i386_defconfig' too.
>>>
>>> Can you please share that .config, or debug a bit?
>>
>> $ make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 defconfig
>>
>
> I still can't reproduce this :(
>
>> This fixes the build error for me when CONFIG_PSI=n.
>
> I have CONFIG_PSI=n
There was also this report about linux-next, also with CONFIG_PSI=n:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/EF33D230-9A8F-41C5-A38D-95128603224F@linux.ibm.com/
but I just tried to build with the .config file supplied there and didn't
have any build errors...
If it was just me & mmotm, I could see it being a problem with applying
patches, but this other report looks the same as my initial report.
I dunno. If it persists, we will track it down and quash it.
>> ---
>> include/linux/psi.h | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> --- mmotm-2022-0316-1742.orig/include/linux/psi.h
>> +++ mmotm-2022-0316-1742/include/linux/psi.h
>> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ static inline int psi_cgroup_alloc(struc
>> static inline void psi_cgroup_free(struct cgroup *cgrp)
>> {
>> }
>> +
>> +#include <linux/cgroup-defs.h>
>> +
>> static inline void cgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *p, struct css_set *to)
>> {
>> rcu_assign_pointer(p->cgroups, to);
>
> Nothing in -next touches psi.h so I am unable to determine which patch
> needs fixing :(
--
~Randy
More information about the linux-um
mailing list