[PATCH v7 04/26] virtio_ring: split: extract the logic of creating vring

Xuan Zhuo xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com
Wed Mar 9 01:20:03 PST 2022


Agree for all.

Thanks.

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:46:01 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> 在 2022/3/8 下午8:34, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> > Separate the logic of split to create vring queue.
> >
> > For the convenience of passing parameters, add a structure
> > vring_split.
> >
> > This feature is required for subsequent virtuqueue reset vring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index b87130c8f312..d32793615451 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -85,6 +85,13 @@ struct vring_desc_extra {
> >   	u16 next;			/* The next desc state in a list. */
> >   };
> >
> > +struct vring_split {
> > +	void *queue;
> > +	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> > +	size_t queue_size_in_bytes;
> > +	struct vring vring;
> > +};
>
>
> So this structure will be only used in vring_create_vring_split() which
> seems not that useful.
>
> More see below.
>
>
> > +
> >   struct vring_virtqueue {
> >   	struct virtqueue vq;
> >
> > @@ -915,28 +922,21 @@ static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >   	return NULL;
> >   }
> >
> > -static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
> > -	unsigned int index,
> > -	unsigned int num,
> > -	unsigned int vring_align,
> > -	struct virtio_device *vdev,
> > -	bool weak_barriers,
> > -	bool may_reduce_num,
> > -	bool context,
> > -	bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *),
> > -	void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *),
> > -	const char *name)
> > +static int vring_create_vring_split(struct vring_split *vring,
> > +				    struct virtio_device *vdev,
> > +				    unsigned int vring_align,
> > +				    bool weak_barriers,
> > +				    bool may_reduce_num,
> > +				    u32 num)
>
>
> I'd rename this as vring_alloc_queue_split() and let it simply return
> the address of queue like vring_alloc_queue().
>
> And let it simple accept dma_addr_t *dma_adder instead of vring_split.
>
>
> >   {
> > -	struct virtqueue *vq;
> >   	void *queue = NULL;
> >   	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> >   	size_t queue_size_in_bytes;
> > -	struct vring vring;
> >
> >   	/* We assume num is a power of 2. */
> >   	if (num & (num - 1)) {
> >   		dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num);
> > -		return NULL;
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >   	}
> >
> >   	/* TODO: allocate each queue chunk individually */
> > @@ -947,11 +947,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
> >   		if (queue)
> >   			break;
> >   		if (!may_reduce_num)
> > -			return NULL;
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> >   	}
> >
> >   	if (!num)
> > -		return NULL;
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> >   	if (!queue) {
> >   		/* Try to get a single page. You are my only hope! */
> > @@ -959,21 +959,49 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
> >   					  &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> >   	}
> >   	if (!queue)
> > -		return NULL;
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> >   	queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align);
> > -	vring_init(&vring, num, queue, vring_align);
> > +	vring_init(&vring->vring, num, queue, vring_align);
>
>
> It's better to move this to its caller (vring_create_virtqueue_split),
> so we have rather simple logic below:
>
>
>
> > +
> > +	vring->dma_addr = dma_addr;
> > +	vring->queue = queue;
> > +	vring->queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split(
> > +	unsigned int index,
> > +	unsigned int num,
> > +	unsigned int vring_align,
> > +	struct virtio_device *vdev,
> > +	bool weak_barriers,
> > +	bool may_reduce_num,
> > +	bool context,
> > +	bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *),
> > +	void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *),
> > +	const char *name)
> > +{
> > +	struct vring_split vring;
> > +	struct virtqueue *vq;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	err = vring_create_vring_split(&vring, vdev, vring_align, weak_barriers,
> > +				       may_reduce_num, num);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return NULL;
>
>
> queue = vring_alloc_queue_split(vdev, &dma_addr, ...);
>
> if (!queue)
>
>      return -ENOMEM;
>
> vring_init();
>
> ...
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > -	vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context,
> > +	vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring.vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context,
> >   				   notify, callback, name);
> >   	if (!vq) {
> > -		vring_free_queue(vdev, queue_size_in_bytes, queue,
> > -				 dma_addr);
> > +		vring_free_queue(vdev, vring.queue_size_in_bytes, vring.queue,
> > +				 vring.dma_addr);
> >   		return NULL;
> >   	}
> >
> > -	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr;
> > -	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes;
> > +	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = vring.dma_addr;
> > +	to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = vring.queue_size_in_bytes;
> >   	to_vvq(vq)->we_own_ring = true;
> >
> >   	return vq;
>



More information about the linux-um mailing list