[PATCH] LOCKDEP: use depends on LOCKDEP_SUPPORT instead of $ARCH list

[Ingo Molnar]

* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> wrote:

> Both arch/um/ and arch/xtensa/ cause a Kconfig warning for LOCKDEP.
> These arch-es select LOCKDEP_SUPPORT but they are not listed as one
> of the arch-es that LOCKDEP depends on.
> 
> Since (16) arch-es define the Kconfig symbol LOCKDEP_SUPPORT if they
> intend to have LOCKDEP support, replace the awkward list of
> arch-es that LOCKDEP depends on with the LOCKDEP_SUPPORT symbol.
> 
> Fixes this kconfig warning: (for both um and xtensa)
> 
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LOCKDEP
>   Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y] && (FRAME_POINTER [=n] || MIPS || PPC || S390 || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARC || X86)
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - PROVE_LOCKING [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>   - LOCK_STAT [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>   - DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman at redhat.com>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng at gmail.com>
> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris at zankel.net>
> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc at gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-xtensa at linux-xtensa.org
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net>
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike at addtoit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard at nod.at>
> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov at cambridgegreys.com>
> Cc: linux-um at lists.infradead.org
> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20210514.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ linux-next-20210514/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ config LOCKDEP
>  	bool
>  	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
>  	select STACKTRACE
> -	depends on FRAME_POINTER || MIPS || PPC || S390 || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARC || X86
> +	depends on FRAME_POINTER || LOCKDEP_SUPPORT

Ok - the FRAME_POINTER bit is weird. Are there any architectures that have 
FRAME_POINTER defined but no LOCKDEP_SUPPORT?

Thanks,

	Ingo