[PATCH 1/2] um: time-travel: fix IRQ handling in time_travel_handle_message()

[Johannes Berg]

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com>

As the comment here indicates, we need to do the polling in the
idle loop without blocking interrupts, since interrupts can be
vhost-user messages that we must process even while in our idle
loop.

I don't know why I explained one thing and implemented another,
but we have indeed observed random hangs due to this, depending
on the timing of the messages.

Fixes: 88ce64249233 ("um: Implement time-travel=ext")
Change-Id: Ic74385f3d36466cc01cc8487fc54affe0fdf7f26
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com>
---
 arch/um/kernel/time.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/time.c b/arch/um/kernel/time.c
index 25eaa6a0c658..c07436e89e59 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/time.c
@@ -70,13 +70,17 @@ static void time_travel_handle_message(struct um_timetravel_msg *msg,
 	 * read of the message and write of the ACK.
 	 */
 	if (mode != TTMH_READ) {
+		bool disabled = irqs_disabled();
+
+		BUG_ON(mode == TTMH_IDLE && !disabled);
+
+		if (disabled)
+			local_irq_enable();
 		while (os_poll(1, &time_travel_ext_fd) != 0) {
-			if (mode == TTMH_IDLE) {
-				BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
-				local_irq_enable();
-				local_irq_disable();
-			}
+			/* nothing */
 		}
+		if (disabled)
+			local_irq_disable();
 	}
 
 	ret = os_read_file(time_travel_ext_fd, msg, sizeof(*msg));
-- 
2.26.2