[PATCH 2/7] um: virtio: use dynamic IRQ allocation

[Johannes Berg]

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com>

This separates the devices, which is better for debug and for
later suspend/resume and wakeup support, since there we'll
have to separate which IRQs can wake up the system and which
cannot.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com>
---
 arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
 arch/um/include/asm/irq.h    |  5 ++---
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c b/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c
index f76b8da28d20..94b112749d5b 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ struct virtio_uml_device {
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
 
 	spinlock_t sock_lock;
-	int sock, req_fd;
+	int sock, req_fd, irq;
 	u64 features;
 	u64 protocol_features;
 	u8 status;
@@ -409,12 +409,14 @@ static int vhost_user_init_slave_req(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev)
 		return rc;
 	vu_dev->req_fd = req_fds[0];
 
-	rc = um_request_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vu_dev->req_fd, IRQ_READ,
+	rc = um_request_irq(UM_IRQ_ALLOC, vu_dev->req_fd, IRQ_READ,
 			    vu_req_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED,
 			    vu_dev->pdev->name, vu_dev);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		goto err_close;
 
+	vu_dev->irq = rc;
+
 	rc = vhost_user_send_no_payload_fd(vu_dev, VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD,
 					   req_fds[1]);
 	if (rc)
@@ -423,7 +425,7 @@ static int vhost_user_init_slave_req(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev)
 	goto out;
 
 err_free_irq:
-	um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vu_dev);
+	um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vu_dev);
 err_close:
 	os_close_file(req_fds[0]);
 out:
@@ -802,7 +804,11 @@ static void vu_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq)
 	struct virtio_uml_vq_info *info = vq->priv;
 
 	if (info->call_fd >= 0) {
-		um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vq);
+		struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev;
+
+		vu_dev = to_virtio_uml_device(vq->vdev);
+
+		um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vq);
 		os_close_file(info->call_fd);
 	}
 
@@ -852,7 +858,7 @@ static int vu_setup_vq_call_fd(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev,
 		return rc;
 
 	info->call_fd = call_fds[0];
-	rc = um_request_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, info->call_fd, IRQ_READ,
+	rc = um_request_irq(vu_dev->irq, info->call_fd, IRQ_READ,
 			    vu_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, info->name, vq);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		goto close_both;
@@ -864,7 +870,7 @@ static int vu_setup_vq_call_fd(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev,
 	goto out;
 
 release_irq:
-	um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vq);
+	um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vq);
 close_both:
 	os_close_file(call_fds[0]);
 out:
@@ -969,7 +975,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vu_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 
 error_setup:
 	if (info->call_fd >= 0) {
-		um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vq);
+		um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vq);
 		os_close_file(info->call_fd);
 	}
 error_call:
@@ -1078,7 +1084,7 @@ static void virtio_uml_release_dev(struct device *d)
 
 	/* might not have been opened due to not negotiating the feature */
 	if (vu_dev->req_fd >= 0) {
-		um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vu_dev);
+		um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vu_dev);
 		os_close_file(vu_dev->req_fd);
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h
index b6fa6301c75b..547bff7b3a89 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -17,18 +17,17 @@
 #define TELNETD_IRQ 		12
 #define XTERM_IRQ 		13
 #define RANDOM_IRQ 		14
-#define VIRTIO_IRQ		15
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UML_NET_VECTOR
 
-#define VECTOR_BASE_IRQ		(VIRTIO_IRQ + 1)
+#define VECTOR_BASE_IRQ		(RANDOM_IRQ + 1)
 #define VECTOR_IRQ_SPACE	8
 
 #define UM_FIRST_DYN_IRQ (VECTOR_IRQ_SPACE + VECTOR_BASE_IRQ)
 
 #else
 
-#define UM_FIRST_DYN_IRQ (VIRTIO_IRQ + 1)
+#define UM_FIRST_DYN_IRQ (RANDOM_IRQ + 1)
 
 #endif
 
-- 
2.26.2