[PATCH v3 3/3] um: allow static linking for non-glibc implementations

[Ignat Korchagin]

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:10 AM Johannes Berg
<johannes at sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 21:11 +0100, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> > It is possible to produce a statically linked UML binary with UML_NET_VECTOR,
> > UML_NET_VDE and UML_NET_PCAP options enabled using alternative libc
> > implementations, which do not rely on NSS, such as musl.
> >
> > Allow static linking in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat at cloudflare.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins at google.com>
> > Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins at google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/um/Kconfig         | 5 +----
> >  arch/um/drivers/Kconfig | 3 ---
> >  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig b/arch/um/Kconfig
> > index 9318dc6d1a0c..beb98b3b9f75 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig
> > @@ -62,12 +62,9 @@ config NR_CPUS
> >
> >  source "arch/$(HEADER_ARCH)/um/Kconfig"
> >
> > -config FORBID_STATIC_LINK
> > -     bool
> > -
> >  config STATIC_LINK
> >       bool "Force a static link"
> > -     depends on !FORBID_STATIC_LINK
> > +     depends on CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC_NO_RUNTIME_DEPS || (!UML_NET_VECTOR && !UML_NET_VDE && !UML_NET_PCAP)
>
> Come to think of it, in a way "FORBID_STATIC_LINK" was nicer because
> there didn't need to be a single list of "what has dynamic dependencies"
> like here the list of UML_NET_VECTOR, UML_NET_VDE, UML_NET_PCAP.
>
> Maybe it could be
>
> config MAY_HAVE_NON_STATIC_RUNTIME_DEPS
>         bool
>
> config STATIC_LINK
>         ...
>         depends on !MAY_HAVE_NON_STATIC_RUNTIME_DEPS || CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC_NO_RUNTIME_DEPS
>
>
> and then UML_NET_VECTOR et al can
>
>         select MAY_HAVE_NON_STATIC_RUNTIME_DEPS
>
> so that the knowledge is still distributed to the corresponding options?

Yes, makes sense. I've shortened it to MAY_HAVE_RUNTIME_DEPS and
reposted the series.

> johannes
>