[PATCH v2 2/7] um: virtio: use dynamic IRQ allocation
Johannes Berg
johannes at sipsolutions.net
Wed Dec 2 06:59:51 EST 2020
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com>
This separates the devices, which is better for debug and for
later suspend/resume and wakeup support, since there we'll
have to separate which IRQs can wake up the system and which
cannot.
Acked-By: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov at cambridgegreys.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com>
---
arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
arch/um/include/asm/irq.h | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c b/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c
index f76b8da28d20..94b112749d5b 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ struct virtio_uml_device {
struct platform_device *pdev;
spinlock_t sock_lock;
- int sock, req_fd;
+ int sock, req_fd, irq;
u64 features;
u64 protocol_features;
u8 status;
@@ -409,12 +409,14 @@ static int vhost_user_init_slave_req(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev)
return rc;
vu_dev->req_fd = req_fds[0];
- rc = um_request_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vu_dev->req_fd, IRQ_READ,
+ rc = um_request_irq(UM_IRQ_ALLOC, vu_dev->req_fd, IRQ_READ,
vu_req_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED,
vu_dev->pdev->name, vu_dev);
if (rc < 0)
goto err_close;
+ vu_dev->irq = rc;
+
rc = vhost_user_send_no_payload_fd(vu_dev, VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD,
req_fds[1]);
if (rc)
@@ -423,7 +425,7 @@ static int vhost_user_init_slave_req(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev)
goto out;
err_free_irq:
- um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vu_dev);
+ um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vu_dev);
err_close:
os_close_file(req_fds[0]);
out:
@@ -802,7 +804,11 @@ static void vu_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq)
struct virtio_uml_vq_info *info = vq->priv;
if (info->call_fd >= 0) {
- um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vq);
+ struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev;
+
+ vu_dev = to_virtio_uml_device(vq->vdev);
+
+ um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vq);
os_close_file(info->call_fd);
}
@@ -852,7 +858,7 @@ static int vu_setup_vq_call_fd(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev,
return rc;
info->call_fd = call_fds[0];
- rc = um_request_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, info->call_fd, IRQ_READ,
+ rc = um_request_irq(vu_dev->irq, info->call_fd, IRQ_READ,
vu_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, info->name, vq);
if (rc < 0)
goto close_both;
@@ -864,7 +870,7 @@ static int vu_setup_vq_call_fd(struct virtio_uml_device *vu_dev,
goto out;
release_irq:
- um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vq);
+ um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vq);
close_both:
os_close_file(call_fds[0]);
out:
@@ -969,7 +975,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vu_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
error_setup:
if (info->call_fd >= 0) {
- um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vq);
+ um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vq);
os_close_file(info->call_fd);
}
error_call:
@@ -1078,7 +1084,7 @@ static void virtio_uml_release_dev(struct device *d)
/* might not have been opened due to not negotiating the feature */
if (vu_dev->req_fd >= 0) {
- um_free_irq(VIRTIO_IRQ, vu_dev);
+ um_free_irq(vu_dev->irq, vu_dev);
os_close_file(vu_dev->req_fd);
}
diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h
index b6fa6301c75b..547bff7b3a89 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -17,18 +17,17 @@
#define TELNETD_IRQ 12
#define XTERM_IRQ 13
#define RANDOM_IRQ 14
-#define VIRTIO_IRQ 15
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_NET_VECTOR
-#define VECTOR_BASE_IRQ (VIRTIO_IRQ + 1)
+#define VECTOR_BASE_IRQ (RANDOM_IRQ + 1)
#define VECTOR_IRQ_SPACE 8
#define UM_FIRST_DYN_IRQ (VECTOR_IRQ_SPACE + VECTOR_BASE_IRQ)
#else
-#define UM_FIRST_DYN_IRQ (VIRTIO_IRQ + 1)
+#define UM_FIRST_DYN_IRQ (RANDOM_IRQ + 1)
#endif
--
2.26.2
More information about the linux-um
mailing list