ARC testsuite regressions (was Re: [PATCH v7.2 07/13] ARC: Linux Syscall Interface)

[Alistair Francis]

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> * Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha
> > <libc-alpha at sourceware.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> >> >> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs <glibcs> now (expect some
> >> >> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run
> >> >
> >> > No regressions in sysvipc tests !
> >>
> >> But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream 81b1c8cbb5b4
> >> "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in ARC port
> >> off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant for
> >> shmctl)"
> >>
> >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic
> >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2
> >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3
> >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4
> >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5
> >> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym
> >> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static
> >> FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen
> >> FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static
> >
> > I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32.
>
> Did you rebuild from scratch?  After the libc.so/ld.so ABI changes that
> went in recently, it could be the result of incomplete make
> dependencies.

I re-built glibc from scratch on a RV32 setup.

I have now updated the RV32 host (GCC and host glibc) to be built from
the latest master and am rebuilding now.

Alistair

>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>